Sorry. I do not get into polarized "debates." Like I said, the truth is not so simple as this or that and I also know that if I needed to, I could argue either position effectively. So, I will continue to agree to disagree in this area. You can think of it as you will. You are so convinced that your position is the correct one, that you are in danger of being no different than those completely sold out in the other position. This is not a matter of this is correct, or this is wrong. Science is never that black and white.

I can appreciate your strongly held beliefs, but I do not happen to agree with all of what that particular position holds, no more than I am buying everything we have been led to believe about viral theory. Nothing I could convey is going to change you mind. So, what is the point? My viewpoints are based upon my personal research, education, and professional experience. I have lost employment because of not being willing to buy into the accepted narratives. I have paid a heavy price to be a free critical thinker. So, I do not think that playing one up on creds here is productive.

The one thing that I can say, having worked in research and clinical sciences for years, is that more research needs to be done in order to show evidence of some hypothesis. So far, terrain theory has not shown that evidence - and neither has the proponents of viral theory that has not been manipulated to produce a foregone conclusion. However, I don't blame terrain people for not having that research, because frankly, no one has been willing to step up and fund it. But, until I can see some lab results that can point in a particular direction and give me data, the jury is still out for me - no matter how solid the opinions may be. The lab is where even the best hypothesis goes to die - or be manipulated.

Thank you for your time.