Or at least that's what it appears they are doing.
Consider the erratic behavior surrounding the 2022 midterms...
These strange "troll" endorsements are necessary to ensure the predictive algorithm is continually tuned in to the cheating apparatus.
Understand the Information War we are currently witnessing; the back-and forth between fraud and counter-fraud measures.
Trump isn't endorsing people he thinks will get the job done, if that's not clear after McConnell stabbed him in the back despite his 2020 endorsement...
Nope. Think clearly.
What benefit is there in simply KNOWING the outcome of an election rigged all to hell? months in advance, no less.
No matter what the DeepState does, Trump is always at least one step ahead because he has a machine tuned exactly to what we can expect in any given, rigged, election.
Then, we factor in the sheer, raw girth of his Endorsement and we see the full picture.
Trump and Patriots are carefully tuning an algorithm to detect Election Fraud. By about May of 2023 it will likely be complete. They'd be able to tell you who would win an election, endorsements and voter fraud included.
Think of it a big middle finger to all the pollsters out there thinking they're hot shit...
If Patriots' predictive model lines up exactly with what is expected in a super-rigged election using a multi-faceted approach (mail-in ballots, drop boxes, illegals voting, Dominion vote switching, rerunning ballots, etc.) then they can submit that as absolute proof of fraud.
Imagine what would be said if Vegas betters came up with a 100% accurate predictive matrix for elections?!
They'd never hold another election bet again.
And then they can work to prevent it. Period.
Whatever they're cooking up, it's gonna be unbeatable. Straight up Project Looking Glass but exclusively for elections.
That's what he's up to with the strange endorsements like AOC and Dr. Oz.
He's calibrating a machine. An anti-voter fraud predictive model. To tell him with 100% accuracy who will win.
Then he can move some levers and press some buttons in the public sphere, and bam, he knows exactly what to do to beat the rigged game.
And the cherry on top is that Trump looks like a fifth-dimensional fortune teller.
Their goose is thoroughly cooked...
I strategically use the [Theory] flare when I'm presenting a theory.
As for my bold assertions...
If I can't convince myself that the theory is correct, how might I have any hope of convincing others?
So, I write with an assertive tone to get the point across. Add in analogies to support my case and illustrate the picture, and if it works then people will give it the thumbs up.
If it's a lousy theory, the flaws will appear to me as I fluster trying to support it in the comments. The hardest part is accepting your theory is indefensible, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try.
What matters most of all isn't that any theory is correct, but that people are thinking about it and forming pathways in their mind to be able to Discern, with a capital D.
Consider them exercises meant to sharpen people's bullshit meter to a fine point.
Thanks for the response, your theory does sound plausible. I just wondered if you may have had some insider information.