Q basically confirmed alien life does exist. They know where ET is from and what they are doing here , or have done. How ever, Q has also confirmed God exist in the sense that the Q team believes in God and biblical prophecy. Now why am I saying these things ? Very simple, I’m trying to show you that aliens exist, just like we do, but so do higher dimensional beings, we know them as angels, and demons. So remember Alien does not always mean angels, and angels does not always mean aliens form another planet with in our universe. Who knows how many more gardens of Eden exist out there. Who knows how many of Gods creation have remained faithful and pure. Maybe the story has been repeated over and over. Maybe the serpents always try to corrupt anywhere God has created sentient life. What are your thoughts?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
You need not make it extraterrestrial to answer these questions.
I am one of those that has no religion as you define it. I do not even maintain the same concept of God as you do. So, yes, I reject the bible based on factual evidence. It means I accept it based on epistemological reasons. Some of the scripture parts are imparting wisdom.
Prayer has a function, not only in preserving faith, but also in terms of maintaining your spirituality and emotional balance. It is a gateway of connection. It also maintains the needed frequency for a co-creation that is needed to pull off this grand reverse heist with a global dimension.
Do I need to be saved by your guy? I leave that to your guy. I am sure your guy has the capacity of knowing what to do in my case.
But let' s consider the hypothetical: there are indeed countless civilizations out there. What of it?
eh .... well, The holy book says that because Adam and Eve, on a planet, obscured away in some recess of the Milky Way, a galaxy among billions of Galaxies, because they ate from the tree, God subjected ALL OF CREATION to sin and the need of SALVATION ..... so, God send his only Child to earth, you know, to that obscure blue planet in some recess of a spiral arm of the Milky way, a mediocre Galaxy among billions of galaxies containing billions of planets ... to redeem ....... mankind.
Would it be logical to suppose that Paul, while writing this, was privy to what we know? And that his worldview was a bit eh ... contemporary with Romans and other people of that time-frame? At best he might have heard about Greek thought in terms of the solar-system and the planets moving around the sun, but eh ... I think a very good bet would be to postulate he was not even aware of the Americas.
With that said, I think such language should be considered in those terms. Because why would a civilization, being 100 million light-years from this planet, be affected by something Adam and Eve, without civilization, living as gatherers, naked, are supposed to have done 6000 years ago? Does that even come close to how you perceive what is right? Or are you into collective guilt?
But I do find Paul's words to be hopeful:
I don't believe in the lord if that wasn't clear. I was questioning the basis of the religion. When I say the power of prayer is in us I mean human beings have tremendous thought power. I think we agree. The premises of religions never seemed plausible to me.
Yes, we do agree.