Oklahoma's tabulation system is Hart.
Ballots are paper and scanned into secured and locked box. Tallies are confirmed by all precinct officials with their initials.
When one votes in person, they sign the precinct log book. This book can be used to verify the Cast vote records info imho. At least it can if you voted in person.
Edit.
Adding this here just to keep stuff together.
No. These are not voter records. There is no connection to the identity of the voter. These are the timestamped records of when each vote was cast. When viewed in sequence patterns emerge. That is what they are looking for, unnatural patterns that are not random.
Am curious. Is this information the same as the Cast Voter Record info?
https://oklahoma.gov/elections/candidates/voter-list.html
Reading the information package link for the OK EDW, it appears so.
Wouldn't it make sense for the ones doing the analysis to request their own access to this?
Oh. And one more important detail...privacy accommodations. https://oklahoma.gov/elections/candidates/voter-list/voter-privacy-programs.html
Oklahoma's tabulation system is Hart. Ballots are paper and scanned into secured and locked box. Tallies are confirmed by all precinct officials with their initials.
When one votes in person, they sign the precinct log book. This book can be used to verify the Cast vote records info imho. At least it can if you voted in person.
Edit. Adding this here just to keep stuff together.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/oklahoma/Okla-Admin-Code-SS-230-35-3-85.4
No. These are not voter records. There is no connection to the identity of the voter. These are the timestamped records of when each vote was cast. When viewed in sequence patterns emerge. That is what they are looking for, unnatural patterns that are not random.
OK. Thanks. Will continue to inquire.
"Cast Vote Records" not "Cast Voter Records". (got confused).