Untreated survival rate. Plentiful quantities of safe therapeutics. Known problems with the CDC treatment regimen. Hasty testing of the vaccine product. Implausible method of action of the vaccine product. Pfizer's lousy safety record. Lousy record of FDA and CDC w/respect to vaccinations and improper motivations of those same entities (regulatory capture).
There was literally zero credible argument in favor of getting the vaccine. Zero.
It was not a hard issue to research. I've invested more time in researching lawn mowers. Scott is just embarrassed that his "research" amounted to passively absorbing AP talking points.
The absence of an mRNA vaccine ever passing safety standards. Undermining studies that would have prevented EUA from passing. Censoring any debate about the product or COVID in general. Dismissing VAERS cases. Suppressing the trial data. Not testing pregnant women then immediately recommending they take it. Pushing it on kids and younger people who were completely unaffected. The government going to insane levels to coerce people into taking it rather than just offering it on its own merits.
Just a never-ending parade of red alerts that fuckery was afoot. I step away from my desk and remember ten more. Any single one of the points mentioned in this thread was a perfectly cogent reason not to take the product, and known at the time the product was offered.
All of the real damage is still being heavily suppressed and is mostly known by hearsay. Clott is either a top tier shithead or just a very long way from realizing what went down.
Nah scott, it was the untreated survival rate that tipped most of us off. It wasn't guessing, that's his cognitive dissonance showing.
Untreated survival rate. Plentiful quantities of safe therapeutics. Known problems with the CDC treatment regimen. Hasty testing of the vaccine product. Implausible method of action of the vaccine product. Pfizer's lousy safety record. Lousy record of FDA and CDC w/respect to vaccinations and improper motivations of those same entities (regulatory capture).
There was literally zero credible argument in favor of getting the vaccine. Zero.
It was not a hard issue to research. I've invested more time in researching lawn mowers. Scott is just embarrassed that his "research" amounted to passively absorbing AP talking points.
The absence of an mRNA vaccine ever passing safety standards. Undermining studies that would have prevented EUA from passing. Censoring any debate about the product or COVID in general. Dismissing VAERS cases. Suppressing the trial data. Not testing pregnant women then immediately recommending they take it. Pushing it on kids and younger people who were completely unaffected. The government going to insane levels to coerce people into taking it rather than just offering it on its own merits.
Just a never-ending parade of red alerts that fuckery was afoot. I step away from my desk and remember ten more. Any single one of the points mentioned in this thread was a perfectly cogent reason not to take the product, and known at the time the product was offered.
All of the real damage is still being heavily suppressed and is mostly known by hearsay. Clott is either a top tier shithead or just a very long way from realizing what went down.