Hello Everyone, I have a question. My fancy 1000.00 5G phone is burning the crap out of my hand. I have been having a stining sensation on my left hand. It goes away if i leave it on the charger away from my body. But damn if im on the forums the stinging returns. Its the phone and comes back as soon as I pick up this hand held microwave. Can anyone suggest a method to handle this thing or turn down the singing affect? I plan on turning off mobil and switching to wifi when at home. My cellphone provider built new towers and we had to switch to all 5G phones. They told us the 4G phones would no longer work. This is ridiculous.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
A phone is not the mark assuming you mean the mark of the beast.
It was you who first said "mark of the beast". I did not. Since you stated it, I will say the 'smart' phone is the gateway to the 'mark of the beast'. It will be used to set up the required system of universal dependency to make the mark of the beast possible. Watch "The Game" episode to see how this is possible.
So you agree it's not the mark.
Accepting one does not make it a given you accept the other.
Further, I'm not even convinced it's the gateway. From what I've seen it seems likely that their plan is to make an implantable chip that goes in your hand or your forehead that will be the only way to buy and sell, and also track you at all times. A phone is not a requirement for this. It may be part of it but they could just as easily skip it and push for the chip directly with no phone integration/requirement if people all decided they didn't want a phone. And all they need to do to ensure dependency is to make it required to buy and sell. A LOT of people would unfortunately get it in the blink of an eye. No phone or prior established system of universal dependency required. Simply make it law that you need the chip to buy and sell and the job is done. Frankly, I doubt having people be dependent on their phones beforehand would make a big difference in this.
I suppose you could say that since people have accepted the phone, because they're likely planning on integrating the chip with the phone, and because their method/plan does appear to be to use the phone as the precursor that does make it the gateway to the 'next step', but then I'd just refer you back to the second thing I said in this reply. I don't need to accept the mark to make use of a separate, possibly indirectly linked technology. Using a tool does not mean the tool is using me, though it can and does for many people.
In fact, my phone is extremely useful. There are plenty of times when I use it to look something up on the spot when going to the computer isn't ideal or possible. When arguing something with someone who isn't fully convinced I find it much better to find an actual source to read from instead of just expecting them to believe me. I also can't remember everything so it's helpful to be able to verify I'm giving out the correct and full information. It's also useful for me when I don't know something to be able to look it up. Knowledge is power and being able to learn anything from anywhere is extremely useful.
There are also plenty of people here on GAW who use their phones to access the site, and I'd wager at least a portion of them don't even own a computer. Without the smartphone, they'd not be able to come here or similar places with the truth and would simply be at the mercy of the MSM for their news, or have no information on the larger outside world at all. Which isn't a terrible thing but would mean one less person working with us to hopefully fix the country and the world.
Except YOU are knowledge. It's not the 'smart' phone's ability to access a continuously smaller arena of permitted speech. Imagine this getting less and less as time goes on. This is what we are actually seeing. GAW happens to be one island of discussion and interaction. Of course there are others as well, but it's not nearly as many as in years past.
The Internet is dying, if not already dead. It'll always be 'there', but it won't be the information source it once was. INHO, that is already in the distant past. Your cell phone will still be the tracking device it always was after the Internet is completely destroyed. Considering this with the near success of mandatory vax☠xination, the 'smart' phone is already tied to a government App in Canada. To travel out of the country and to get in, an individual must have this App showing they are vax☠xed. Albeit, things have loosened up a bit in the United States, we are not out of the woods with this yet. Look at Mike Tyson. He's in a wheel chair. He did not want to take the Vax☠x, but was coerced in doing so because he said his paycheck depended on international travel. He couldn't travel unless he had the phone App showing evidence he was vax☠xed. Now, he is gravely injured. He himself said he expects his death to come soon.
You may disagree with me, but everything I'm seeing with a 'smart' phone seems to be pointing in 'that' direction. The 'smart' phone is saying --"there's the gate. Go through it". To me, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it's a duck. I got rid of mine 4 years ago and I'm very happy I did.
Sorry for the late response.
The way I see it the tool is still useful. If and when that ceases to be the case (e.g. places like GAW disappear entirely or it's impossible to own one without also submitting to vax pass bullshit) I'll be right there with you in throwing mine away.
You could look at it like fighting fire with fire. They want to use this tool against us, so I say we use it against them as long as we can. Q's message would have been half as effective if no one had a phone. Many don't have a computer and their phones were the only way they were able to get on board and find/be made aware of the truth. So until it becomes truly useless and/or untenable to possess one I, at least personally, still see value in myself and others having one.
Edit: To add, I agree with much of what you're saying here. Just disagree on things like the timeline regarding the death of truth online and whether or not it's beneficial to have one currently I suppose.