Pick your side.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
No, it means total freedom from government coercion, not total freedom from rules protecting other people.
Did you think I used “rules” to avoid using “laws”? Legitimate law enforcement isn’t coercive. You statists are trying to construct a strawman by saying that those of us who want freedom from government coercion really want freedom from laws. Not true. God gave us the law so we could be more free from strife.
What is "legitimate law enforcement?" Modern brown shirts telling you what you may or may not do?
No one was arguing against legit laws, you super-heterosexual man, you
Ok, but if it isnt specified as such by very people fighting for the cause of such, then they can, and will, sway people to fight for full freedom to include freedom of consequences. We must, and should have all along, have people declare EXACTLY what it is they are advocating for, no "in between the lines"/assumption messaging.
Its cool that you have a person IRL relationship with him to know for sure what it IS or IS NOT that he is implying roll eyes Character limits be damned, one can make multiple tweets.
Far too many people, even in this "movement" give strangers online too much blind trust and faith.