He is very convincing! I like him.
I am leaning towards viruses existing but we can't yet isolate them and their creation is from cell breakdown. I do think we can transmit viruses.
let's have fun debating.
" Versuses don't cause the disease they are just trash." To discredit this:
Bayer shipped a bunch of HIV-contaminated aspirin to China which then cause a large number of people in China to then get HIV. If it's just trash and doesn't cause disease, please explain how they got infected with HIV.
I don't want semantics. Like, as "Viruses are contaminants." therefore the pills were contaminants, which infected people and got them HIV. Well, viruses are contaminants.
If you are saying viruses are not RNA/DNA but something else, then maybe you could be right but it doesn't really change anything does it?
There is something that spreads from person to person, and each of these people has this same "trash" that those without symptoms do not have, you can then take this "trash" and infect others.
The main argument is that it's never been isolated. So I have a question on logic, if you can't isolate something does that mean it doesn't exist? For example, you can't separate the killer from a room of people wearing masks and furniture, and other debris. You cant see the killer kill anyone (stabbing) but people keep dying, you look at several locations and rooms and environments, and each time, you can move a couple of people from the kill room to another room. Each time there is someone who dies from a stabbing but the rooms that kill people are all historically stemming from the original kill room. They know then that the killer is in a specific room just not exactly who is the killer. But the killer does exist.
He admits viruses exist @ 23:35 Bacteriophages
He admits viruses exist @ 24:20 Giant viruses
It's highly possible that the creation of a virus is trash or breakdown of cells and bacteria as he describes. But that just gives the origin of viruses not disputes their existence.
The way people "isolate" or create "vaccines" is bad, I agree, I'm not even gonna pretend that works.
Whatever it was, it was something else. Perhaps a poison.
Louis Pasteur kept a diary. After his death, it was revealed that he kept personal notes in his diary about his experiments. Turns out, he was secretly poisoning test subjects to "prove" is theory.
YOU do not KNOW what it really was, and neither do I.
But if viruses do not exist, it COULD NOT have been HIV.
The main argument is that it's never been isolated.
Isolated AND purified.
Also, EVERY attempt to prove that a "viral infection" is transmissable to others has FAILED.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
If (a) viruses exist, and (b) they transmit to others, making them sick, then ... WHY has NOBODY ever proven that this ACTUALLY happens in the real world, and not just the theoretical ivory towers at universities?
Germs and bacteria are eaters of dead cell debris...viruses are dead cell debris.
"Germs" is a vague term, and means many things, not one thing specifically.
Bacteria are the janitors of the world. They eat dead and diseased tissue, which is why they eat dead animals in the forest, until all the nutrients are dissolved into the ground (the Cycle of Life continues on).
"Viruses" ONLY appear in laboratory experiments. None have ever been seen inside a human. NEVER. MAYBE this breakdown occurs inside the body, and looks similar to the lab experiments, but there is no proof. It is just a guess.
Listen to Dr Andrew Kauffman demolish Judy mikovitz..controlled opposition
That really was interesting to watch and listen to. I don't think she is "controlled opposition." I think she is a real, Kool-Aid drinking, fake scientist. She BELIEVES in the religion of Virology, and cannot comprehend that what she believes is false. So, she ignores the points Kaufman is making.
We have seen something similar here on GAW in various threads, including this one.
The only way they could push the fraud would be to convince the biology students that falsehoods are truths. The students are not critical thinkers. They are followers who memorize enough information that was spoon-fed to them that they can pass the next test. Eventually, they come to think of themselves as "experts."
And they ARE experts -- experts in regurgitating a non-scientific, false paradigm.
But they are NOT scientists, because they REFUSE to follow the Scientific Method and see where it takes them.
Allan Savoy, an expert on regenerative farming, lamented that science students graduate from college and come to work for him, but they have no idea that science is about observing and testing. Instead, they think science means reading peer-reviewed studieds, never considering that those peers have no idea what they are talking about, either.
He is very convincing! I like him. I am leaning towards viruses existing but we can't yet isolate them and their creation is from cell breakdown. I do think we can transmit viruses. let's have fun debating.
Whatever it was, it was something else. Perhaps a poison.
Louis Pasteur kept a diary. After his death, it was revealed that he kept personal notes in his diary about his experiments. Turns out, he was secretly poisoning test subjects to "prove" is theory.
YOU do not KNOW what it really was, and neither do I.
But if viruses do not exist, it COULD NOT have been HIV.
So you disagree with the doctor in the video then.
Isolated AND purified.
Also, EVERY attempt to prove that a "viral infection" is transmissable to others has FAILED.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
If (a) viruses exist, and (b) they transmit to others, making them sick, then ... WHY has NOBODY ever proven that this ACTUALLY happens in the real world, and not just the theoretical ivory towers at universities?
So called viruses are just human dead tissue cells...not alive..no digestive system no neurological system..NADA..could never be contagious
Bitchute COVID-19 virology fraud explained in 19 minutes. He uses a strawberry to explain it...very simple. A child could understand
Germs and bacteria are eaters of dead cell debris...viruses are dead cell debris.
They put these dead cell debris in a Petri dish poisoned with chemicals by the surface proteins which morph into spike proteins......
Listen to Dr Andrew Kauffman demolish Judy mikovitz..controlled opposition..when she tries to convince him there are viruses....
"Germs" is a vague term, and means many things, not one thing specifically.
Bacteria are the janitors of the world. They eat dead and diseased tissue, which is why they eat dead animals in the forest, until all the nutrients are dissolved into the ground (the Cycle of Life continues on).
"Viruses" ONLY appear in laboratory experiments. None have ever been seen inside a human. NEVER. MAYBE this breakdown occurs inside the body, and looks similar to the lab experiments, but there is no proof. It is just a guess.
That really was interesting to watch and listen to. I don't think she is "controlled opposition." I think she is a real, Kool-Aid drinking, fake scientist. She BELIEVES in the religion of Virology, and cannot comprehend that what she believes is false. So, she ignores the points Kaufman is making.
We have seen something similar here on GAW in various threads, including this one.
The only way they could push the fraud would be to convince the biology students that falsehoods are truths. The students are not critical thinkers. They are followers who memorize enough information that was spoon-fed to them that they can pass the next test. Eventually, they come to think of themselves as "experts."
And they ARE experts -- experts in regurgitating a non-scientific, false paradigm.
But they are NOT scientists, because they REFUSE to follow the Scientific Method and see where it takes them.
Allan Savoy, an expert on regenerative farming, lamented that science students graduate from college and come to work for him, but they have no idea that science is about observing and testing. Instead, they think science means reading peer-reviewed studieds, never considering that those peers have no idea what they are talking about, either.