Pope Benedict as a child in the Nazi youth corps
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
I didn't downvote you whatsoever. And not sure what you want to debate, I explained my point and now you're presumptuously attacking me about things I haven't even done.
I'll reiterate it, the Edomites are playing all sides of all conflicts but they did not create all sides as OP falsely asserts over and over until caught out on it, upon which he deletes all traces of his faux-pas.
It was presumptuous, but it was hardly an attack.
How can you possibly know that? What about all the evidence that suggests they did exactly that?
For example, fascism, communism, and socialism are the exact same ism. They all require the exact same ten planks to function: i.e. centralization of authority in the hands of the state (where the state is actually the dictator). The differences between them are how they sell that centralization of authority. Communism says it's a necessary transition before it turns into socialism proper. Socialism lies about it, saying it's not a centralization at all, when in fact that is exactly what it is, and fascism is honest about it.
As for the religions being created by those exact same people, christianity (as we understand the term) AKA the 66 books of the Bible presented as "complete" (leaving out almost as many as were included, including numerous other very important gospels) were ratified by the council of Nicene in 325 AD by Emperor Constantine to unite all the disparate religions of the region to create a singular government. Christianity (the current form, completely different from what was practiced at the time) was made purely as a social control mechanism by the PTB of the time. The evidence suggests Constantine was a puppet of the Cabal (and was a self professed worshiper of Ba'al). Prior to that point, there was no Trinity as we understand the term (one of the most fundamental tenets of modern christianity). That same Church entity (the Holy Roman Empire, soon to be the Catholic Church) created by Constantine, about 200 years later created Muslim through their Jesuit agent, the wife of Mohamad. That church has been fundamentally tied to, what would now be called the Zionists the entire time of it's existence. The Zionists have been hiding among, and direting the religion of the Jews for a thousand years before that at least.
These people then used these various religious beliefs in opposition to create wars over the holy city, all in an attempt to fulfil prophecy, i.e. the rebuilding of the temple of Solomon. They have now accomplished that feat after first taking what is now Israel from the Ottomans (one of the primary targets of WWI, see the Balfour declaration), and then setting up one of the groups they were hiding within (the Jews) to be the fall guy for WWII so that the world would be sympathetic to them taking ownership of that land.
When you look at the connections all of the leaders of these groups had, it all points not to "opportunists" but to "puppeteers."
It's all fake, planted, and not even good evidence. Return to the drawing board. Never forget that the Antichrist will fool all. Obviously he will use muh nazis and muh communists are all evil and the same and unite the churches and "the churches".
This is not an argument against anything I've said. All of the statements I've made come from good, solid evidence. Do I know that the evidence hasn't been fucked with? Of course not, but that doesn't make it not good evidence. You choosing to not look at the evidence, or in any way show inquisitiveness, or a desire to entertain the possibility, and immediately dismissing it as automatically "lies" is not in any way an investigation into the truth. It seems that all you want to do is find things that affirm your biases. It seems you are certain you already know the truth, and anything against your truth can be attributed to "Satan."
This is a common belief for those who call themselves Christian (in the modern sense): "Anything that goes against the Bible (as I understand it) as absolute truth is a lie from Satan."
I am going to propose a question. If I am correct in that nothing is outside of the purview and influence of the Cabal, and they have at the very least injected, if not created the fuckery in every institution, is it possible that they created, in the Bible, that particular belief? As a specific example:
Add to that "completeness," the statements of "Divinely written" (AKA the Bible, exactly as presented, is the direct word of God (i.e. not really written by people)), and the concept of every word being "Absolute Truth," and you have a recipe for a perfect belief that no one will ever question.
This belief would keep anyone from looking at fuckery within the Bible itself. That would then make the Bible a perfect place to hide fuckery. Where would Satan hide fuckery, if Satan were to do so? In a place that no one is allowed to question.
Anyone who can't question their "truths" is someone who is easily led.
That the Bible (as we currently define it) was decided upon at the Nicene convention by Emperor Constantine to create one religion to unite the empire is not in any way controversial. What do you think the Nicene Creed is? I learned about that in Sunday school. Specifically the concept of the "Triune God" as we understand it was created by them and codified into law in 382(ish) AD. This Trinity creates a clear separation of us from God. We must completely rely on God, and Jesus. I suggest that is not what Jesus was trying to teach us, which if you read the rest of the Gospels it will be made clear. If however you rely on God and Jesus in the way the Trinity and the Bible (as presented) suggest, it makes it easy to create a system of control, which is exactly what The Church (and its divine leaders AKA the Pope) were. Even if many Christians have moved past the Pope and his "divinity," they still have a clear and absolute belief of being separate from God.
Separation is always the fuckery in everything Cabal. If you make claims that certain things are separate, and have the media push that separation, anyone who says "its really connected" is a Conspiracy Theorist. Creating separations, when things are actually connected, is the spell that they always cast. Why do you believe they didn't put such fuckery in the Bible itself when it is uncontroversial that it was created by the Roman Emperor (a worshiper of the "Sun God," see link above) and they left out a ton of relevant information. They also had the final edit, which means changing a word here or there is easy. And that is all you need to do. Just change one word, or interpret it slightly different, and you can completely change the meaning.
If you are interested in more resources for further investigation into this topic, or the origins and the supposed leaders of the various Fascist and Communist movements, I am happy to dig further for you. I have all sorts of stuff all over the place I found during my investigation. The key however, is to find the connections. Connections are not "truth." I'm not making statements of truth. But any ideas of "how things work" that can't account for all of the evidence is wrong. There is a ridiculous amount more evidence in support of fuckery within these connections than I have suggested here. This is just a place to begin.
National socialism isn't even the same as socialism, and those are far closer than fascism and communism which are polar opposites with one being downstream of bolshevism that has its root in the talmud and the other being rooted as a countermeasure. While fascism is still garbage, putting state force above all, another ideology puts the people above all.
You are, just as OP, trying to assert the equivalence of an ideology that abolished the Edomites' central banking slavery system with one that lives off of it. And all that on flimsy things like "connections". There are always connections, especially within one period of time. Connections are a fundamental feature of reality. The night is connected to the day and good is connected to evil. That doesn't mean that good is evil and that evil is good.