Simple search of 'MA building 520' yielded 520 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA as the (now former) office address of MA. An image search of that address shows the building in the Q-Post. I think MA is still in jail, not sure, but he's listed as a former attorney so I imagine he's been disbarred.
I wasn't here in the beginning (not until after Q stopped posting, in fact) so many links were gone by the time I discovered Q.
Was it not clear that MA is Michael Avenatti? Did you even try to do a simple search as I stated above? Which search engine did you use that didn't get you relevant results? I used duckduckgo, link below.
Let me step through this for you. ... On the SE line type (without quotes) "Michael Avenatti building 520". This gives you a list of results. Scan down them to see if there's a link to Michael Avenatti and a building 520. I found at least two on the first page of search results and provided you with a link to one of them, below. Scan the article for the relevant info. Sauce.
The wiki listing from duckduckgo lists Avenatti as a former attorney, as I stated above (and it's likely he was disbarred) so I doubt he's renting office space at this former office anymore.
Finally, type in the address given as Avenatti's office into the SE and choose IMAGES. I've provided a link for that as well, below. Compare the image from your SE to the one in the Q-Post and you'll see they're the same. Distinctive Leland pines (I believe) and palm trees typical in California landscaping out front.
Finally, I doubt that POTUS's message, above, has any tie-in to Avenatti or his former office building. I was responding to anon NOTWOKE's question-remark on the Q-Post picture and link, respectively, by clarifying/answering his/her question.
The time stamp on the DJT message links to the Q-Post and, if I had to guess, I'd say Q's message to "Buckle up!" would be a fair tie-in to the federal judge taking over the case of political persecution perpetrated by the FBI by the Mar-A-Lago raid.
I'm looking at the message above that OP provided, lower right corner and it says 17:52 - specifically "Aug 27, 2022, 17:52". I'll leave it in your capable hands to explain how and where you're seeing a different time stamp and if there's a relevant Q-Post that may tie-in if you so choose. I need sleep right now.
Ok. Quite a snappy response, bit rude actually. Thought I would mention it as appears some digging into it, but time for deltas was always NY time as far as I'm aware. I see the reference to 17:52 kicked off a thread of people looking at that post, and the 520 building. But Trump's post was made at 18:52 (NY time), not 17:52, that's just the timezone of the the person who screenshot it.
You should use Qagg to validate time of posts in NY time (UTC -4). In this case it's 1852 and that post doesn't seem to have any relevance.
I wasn't trying to be a dick, just pointing out as seems like may be focus on something that wasn't actually for that particular post.
Thank you for the explanation of the time stamp difference. I didn't think you were being a dick at all. I just didn't have any more energy left (to keep my eyes open) after having been awake nearly twenty-four hours by then to engage with you on this. I also wasn't intending to be rude. If you're referring to the "... I'll leave it in your capable hands..." that's a colloquialism I've used many times in the past to colleagues and vice-versa. It's used in a light-hearted and respectful manner, usually to denote you have to get to a meeting or elsewhere (or to sleep as I used it about six hours ago) and can't continue a conversation. We don't have visual clues when writing (nor audible ones) to see the smile that always goes along with that statement. No offense was intended.
In the future, when possible, I'll check links like OP provided to double check the time stamp. I hadn't looked at them earlier. Again, thank you for the subsequent explanation and the guidance on the proper resource to check. I'm glad you brought the time stamp issue up.
Buckle up!
https://qalerts.app/?q=%231752
Simple search of 'MA building 520' yielded 520 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA as the (now former) office address of MA. An image search of that address shows the building in the Q-Post. I think MA is still in jail, not sure, but he's listed as a former attorney so I imagine he's been disbarred.
I wasn't here in the beginning (not until after Q stopped posting, in fact) so many links were gone by the time I discovered Q.
Any sauce to the 520 building? Is it where Avenetti works? What's the link to it?
Was it not clear that MA is Michael Avenatti? Did you even try to do a simple search as I stated above? Which search engine did you use that didn't get you relevant results? I used duckduckgo, link below.
Let me step through this for you. ... On the SE line type (without quotes) "Michael Avenatti building 520". This gives you a list of results. Scan down them to see if there's a link to Michael Avenatti and a building 520. I found at least two on the first page of search results and provided you with a link to one of them, below. Scan the article for the relevant info. Sauce.
The wiki listing from duckduckgo lists Avenatti as a former attorney, as I stated above (and it's likely he was disbarred) so I doubt he's renting office space at this former office anymore.
Finally, type in the address given as Avenatti's office into the SE and choose IMAGES. I've provided a link for that as well, below. Compare the image from your SE to the one in the Q-Post and you'll see they're the same. Distinctive Leland pines (I believe) and palm trees typical in California landscaping out front.
.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Michael+Avenatti+building+520&t=h_&ia=about
.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/us-politics/la-na-pol-avenatti-eviction-20181022-story.html
.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=520+newport+center+drive&t=h_&ia=images&iax=images
.
Finally, I doubt that POTUS's message, above, has any tie-in to Avenatti or his former office building. I was responding to anon NOTWOKE's question-remark on the Q-Post picture and link, respectively, by clarifying/answering his/her question.
The time stamp on the DJT message links to the Q-Post and, if I had to guess, I'd say Q's message to "Buckle up!" would be a fair tie-in to the federal judge taking over the case of political persecution perpetrated by the FBI by the Mar-A-Lago raid.
I hope this answers your questions.
I think the post was at 1852 though, NYC time, not 1752.
I'm looking at the message above that OP provided, lower right corner and it says 17:52 - specifically "Aug 27, 2022, 17:52". I'll leave it in your capable hands to explain how and where you're seeing a different time stamp and if there's a relevant Q-Post that may tie-in if you so choose. I need sleep right now.
Ok. Quite a snappy response, bit rude actually. Thought I would mention it as appears some digging into it, but time for deltas was always NY time as far as I'm aware. I see the reference to 17:52 kicked off a thread of people looking at that post, and the 520 building. But Trump's post was made at 18:52 (NY time), not 17:52, that's just the timezone of the the person who screenshot it.
You should use Qagg to validate time of posts in NY time (UTC -4). In this case it's 1852 and that post doesn't seem to have any relevance.
I wasn't trying to be a dick, just pointing out as seems like may be focus on something that wasn't actually for that particular post.
Thank you for the explanation of the time stamp difference. I didn't think you were being a dick at all. I just didn't have any more energy left (to keep my eyes open) after having been awake nearly twenty-four hours by then to engage with you on this. I also wasn't intending to be rude. If you're referring to the "... I'll leave it in your capable hands..." that's a colloquialism I've used many times in the past to colleagues and vice-versa. It's used in a light-hearted and respectful manner, usually to denote you have to get to a meeting or elsewhere (or to sleep as I used it about six hours ago) and can't continue a conversation. We don't have visual clues when writing (nor audible ones) to see the smile that always goes along with that statement. No offense was intended.
In the future, when possible, I'll check links like OP provided to double check the time stamp. I hadn't looked at them earlier. Again, thank you for the subsequent explanation and the guidance on the proper resource to check. I'm glad you brought the time stamp issue up.