I really wish people who don't know what they are talking about wouldn't comment about gay stuff on here. Dang, this is impressive. I've known lots of lesbians that were simply lesbians. And no, most ("high percentage") of gays are not pedophiles.
This is ridiculous. (Note, I'm not even reading the whole stupid thing. Just be advised that because you found some article and have various opinions that people will upvote you for here, does not mean you should be taken seriously when you have no fucking clue.)
You can argue your personal beliefs with the researcher Steve Sailor, who has put forth a profoundly sobering study. This is not my opinion. His study and findings comes from surveying many hundreds of individuals. His study is accepted worldwide. Unfortunately, your few personal experiences are an outlier to what lesbianism really is.
"And no, most ("high percentage") of gays are not pedophiles."
This is your 'opinion' and is not correct. Pedophilia is much higher in the sodomist community then in the normal society. Homosexuals have a behavioral trait of being hyper erotic. It is intrinsic with this behavior that fantasies of erotic encounters with children exist. We know those children didn't get monkeypox from 'casual' touching. It is also innately part of this behavior that fantasies of necrophilia and bestiality is present as well. We also know that dog didn't get monkeypox from someone petting it. In fact here's more:
Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover reflects on the Journal of Homosexuality’s “Male Intergenerational Intimacy”:
“This special issue reflects the substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor condemns pedophilia. Rather they argue that pedophilia is an acceptable aspect of sexuality, especially of homosexuality. Indeed, the San Francisco Sentinel, a Bay Area gay-activist newspaper, published a piece arguing that pedophilia is central to male homosexual life” [Satinover, Jeffrey (1996). Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, p. 63.]
Rather they argue that pedophilia is an acceptable aspect of sexuality, especially of homosexuality. Indeed, the San Francisco Sentinel, a Bay Area gay-activist newspaper, published a piece arguing that** pedophilia is central to male homosexual life”** (7).
Gay advocates correctly state that most child molesters are heterosexual males. But this is a misleading statement. In proportion to their numbers (about 1 out of 36 men), homosexual males are more likely to engage in sex with minors: in fact, they appear to be three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations (8). And this does not take into account the cases of homosexual child abuse which are unreported. NARTH’s Executive Director Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, for example, says that about one-third of his 400 adult homosexual clients said they had experienced some form of homosexual abuse before the age of consent, but only two of those cases had been reported.
While no more than 2% of male adults are homosexual, some studies indicate that approximately 35% of pedophiles are homosexual (9). Further, since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles (10), it is estimated that approximately 80% of pedophilic victims are boys who have been molested by adult males (11).
NAMBLA—the North American Man-Boy Love Association—was once the lone voice lobbying for the normalization of pedophilia. NAMBLA representatives marched in gay-pride parades as a fringe element of the gay-rights movement.
Then in 1990, the Journal of Homosexuality produced a special double issue devoted to adult-child sex, which was entitled “Male Intergenerational Intimacy” (1). One article said many pedophiles believe they are “born that way and cannot change” (p. 133). Another writer said a man who counseled troubled teenage boys could achieve “miracles... not by preaching to them, but by sleeping with them.” The loving pedophile can offer a “companionship, security and protection” which neither peers nor parents can provide (p. l62). Parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a thief of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home...” (p. 164).
A British university professor wrote: “Boys want sex with men, boys seduce adult men, the experience is very common and much enjoyed” (p. 323). A professor of social science at the State University of New York says he looks forward to the day when Americans will “get over their hysteria about child abuse” (p. 325) and child pornography.
In fact, the authors of the Psychological Bulletin article propose what they consider may be a better way of understanding pedophilia: that it may only be “abuse” if the child feels bad about the relationship. They are in effect suggesting a repetition of the steps by which homosexuality was normalized. In its first step toward removing homosexuality from the Diagnostic Manual, the A.P.A. said the condition was normal as long as the person did not feel bad about it.
Few laymen are aware that the American Psychiatric Association recently redefined the criteria for pedophilia. According to the latest diagnostic manual (DSM—IV), a person no longer has a psychological disorder simply because he molests children. To be diagnosed as disordered, now he must also feel anxious about the molestation, or be impaired in his work or social relationships. Thus the A.P.A. has left room for the “psychologically normal” pedophile.
I really wish people who don't know what they are talking about wouldn't comment about gay stuff on here. Dang, this is impressive. I've known lots of lesbians that were simply lesbians. And no, most ("high percentage") of gays are not pedophiles.
This is ridiculous. (Note, I'm not even reading the whole stupid thing. Just be advised that because you found some article and have various opinions that people will upvote you for here, does not mean you should be taken seriously when you have no fucking clue.)
You can argue your personal beliefs with the researcher Steve Sailor, who has put forth a profoundly sobering study. This is not my opinion. His study and findings comes from surveying many hundreds of individuals. His study is accepted worldwide. Unfortunately, your few personal experiences are an outlier to what lesbianism really is.
This is your 'opinion' and is not correct. Pedophilia is much higher in the sodomist community then in the normal society. Homosexuals have a behavioral trait of being hyper erotic. It is intrinsic with this behavior that fantasies of erotic encounters with children exist. We know those children didn't get monkeypox from 'casual' touching. It is also innately part of this behavior that fantasies of necrophilia and bestiality is present as well. We also know that dog didn't get monkeypox from someone petting it. In fact here's more:
Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover reflects on the Journal of Homosexuality’s “Male Intergenerational Intimacy”: “This special issue reflects the substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor condemns pedophilia. Rather they argue that pedophilia is an acceptable aspect of sexuality, especially of homosexuality. Indeed, the San Francisco Sentinel, a Bay Area gay-activist newspaper, published a piece arguing that pedophilia is central to male homosexual life” [Satinover, Jeffrey (1996). Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, p. 63.]
Rather they argue that pedophilia is an acceptable aspect of sexuality, especially of homosexuality. Indeed, the San Francisco Sentinel, a Bay Area gay-activist newspaper, published a piece arguing that** pedophilia is central to male homosexual life”** (7).
Gay advocates correctly state that most child molesters are heterosexual males. But this is a misleading statement. In proportion to their numbers (about 1 out of 36 men), homosexual males are more likely to engage in sex with minors: in fact, they appear to be three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations (8). And this does not take into account the cases of homosexual child abuse which are unreported. NARTH’s Executive Director Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, for example, says that about one-third of his 400 adult homosexual clients said they had experienced some form of homosexual abuse before the age of consent, but only two of those cases had been reported. While no more than 2% of male adults are homosexual, some studies indicate that approximately 35% of pedophiles are homosexual (9). Further, since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles (10), it is estimated that approximately 80% of pedophilic victims are boys who have been molested by adult males (11).
NAMBLA—the North American Man-Boy Love Association—was once the lone voice lobbying for the normalization of pedophilia. NAMBLA representatives marched in gay-pride parades as a fringe element of the gay-rights movement.
Then in 1990, the Journal of Homosexuality produced a special double issue devoted to adult-child sex, which was entitled “Male Intergenerational Intimacy” (1). One article said many pedophiles believe they are “born that way and cannot change” (p. 133). Another writer said a man who counseled troubled teenage boys could achieve “miracles... not by preaching to them, but by sleeping with them.” The loving pedophile can offer a “companionship, security and protection” which neither peers nor parents can provide (p. l62). Parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a thief of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home...” (p. 164).
A British university professor wrote: “Boys want sex with men, boys seduce adult men, the experience is very common and much enjoyed” (p. 323). A professor of social science at the State University of New York says he looks forward to the day when Americans will “get over their hysteria about child abuse” (p. 325) and child pornography.
In fact, the authors of the Psychological Bulletin article propose what they consider may be a better way of understanding pedophilia: that it may only be “abuse” if the child feels bad about the relationship. They are in effect suggesting a repetition of the steps by which homosexuality was normalized. In its first step toward removing homosexuality from the Diagnostic Manual, the A.P.A. said the condition was normal as long as the person did not feel bad about it.
Few laymen are aware that the American Psychiatric Association recently redefined the criteria for pedophilia. According to the latest diagnostic manual (DSM—IV), a person no longer has a psychological disorder simply because he molests children. To be diagnosed as disordered, now he must also feel anxious about the molestation, or be impaired in his work or social relationships. Thus the A.P.A. has left room for the “psychologically normal” pedophile.
A Pandora Box has been literally opened.
🙄