Apparently Biden Replacement Theory is now mainstream on here... - The Great Awakening

Apparently Biden Replacement Theory is now mainstream on here... 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 2 years ago by NOT_ADMIN 2 years ago by NOT_ADMIN +15 / -6

Since we are here to find truth, not assumptions. Please provide your abosulte best possible proof that Biden has been replaced with another human.
And please also provide rational to get past the moral delemma where whitehats can kill innocent people through Biden and whats he has done becuase the "end justifies the means" type mentally is truelly immoral.

if each of your "proofs" cant stand up to scrutiny or be explained away using rational and natural causes, then its not proof at all.

Twice this month a BRT was stickied... Here is an example https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTfsTqx3/have-you-ever-known-a-77-year-ol/

75 comments

75 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (75)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– NOT_ADMIN [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

This whole post is about others providing proof he isn't the same.
in yet you seem to ignore all evidence and you won't provide a rational form of evidence you would actually accept.
you also seem to think if I cannot prove to you he isn't replaced that is somehow proof that he is. But. The claim that he is replaced is what would be out of the norm, meaning him being replaced would be what needs to be proven, not him not being replaced.
my "photograph thing" goes back 40 years.
I'm not saying he never used a body double. I am saying he isn't a double mascarading as the real guy 10% while the real video is dead or in prison.
there is LITERALLY only 2 methods to prove tis him which can be used in the court of law. Without physically being around him. 1 is facial wrinkle mapping. Which is used in cold case files to find people after a very long time. 2. Is audio forensics software which is very costly and is highly doubtful that you would even accept it since you won't accept anything reasonable but you will accept any unreasonable evidence that he is replaced. This is exactly why I say you have a delusion. It's not that you will only accept the best evidence, it's that no matter what you will enevidibly concoct some reason why the evidence isn't good enough. You literally can't accept it at this point.
I am convinced you don't even know what liberal bias means.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– motrhed3 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Gee. My read from your whole post was you came up with definite proof it is him because you did some facial wrinkle mapping on a couple photos. Then you seem to be extremely passed the rest of this forum still doesn't except your post. Don't think it's me that is delusional. Was not very nice debating with you. Take care of yourself. No one else will.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– NOT_ADMIN [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Read the post buddy. Never once did I say I have absolute proof, I asked others to provide proof of him being replaced. You failed to do so.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q