Apparently Biden Replacement Theory is now mainstream on here...
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
- Since we are here to find truth, not assumptions. Please provide your abosulte best possible proof that Biden has been replaced with another human.
- And please also provide rational to get past the moral delemma where whitehats can kill innocent people through Biden and whats he has done becuase the "end justifies the means" type mentally is truelly immoral.
- if each of your "proofs" cant stand up to scrutiny or be explained away using rational and natural causes, then its not proof at all.
- Twice this month a BRT was stickied... Here is an example https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTfsTqx3/have-you-ever-known-a-77-year-ol/
You talk like someone owes you.
No one here owes you shit. The people that believe Biden is not Biden haven't taken a damned thing from those that don't believe.
As always time will tell whose ass is the blackest.
I wasn't talking to you. Back off
No...
No I am christian
Please show us your absolute proof that he does not exist.
I'm always a tad amazed by the people who think it's alright to tell others what is acceptable and what to do, as if we're here to live up to that OP's rules, regulations and expectations. Don't we get enough of that from the other side?
No, live up to truth.
You can't command us to believe you, you have to convince us. If you can't do this, then perhaps you should reexamine your own premises.
I can't convince a delusional person they are having a delusion. I have done more analysis on bidens appearance than anyone here.
But your analysis is not at all convincing.
Since you ask, I'm simply going to point out that old Biden had a sloping forehead and new Biden has a more bulbous forehead. They look different. The new Biden looks friendly and fun. Watch the video of Biden years ago berating judge Clarence Thomas. He can't hide his malevolence. It shines off him.
Eye colour, earlobes, neck joins, well they tend to support me.
I'm also going to point out that he looks spry and walks a little too well (maybe until recently ) for an 80 yo. especially one with dementia. People with dementia have an unsteady gait. A shuffle, they just don't have the ability to walk normally.
The gaffes, the trips, they are fantastic, they really help out
I can't do this. I can't see all ends. I can just see that this guy is an actor.
The only way without doing a DNA test or Thumb print to prove if he is or is not the original biden, is with either facial wrinkle mapping, or with audio forensics software. Facial wrinkle mapping already shows that it's the original biden. Every other form of Evidenced is nothing in comparison.
Why are you not willing to go with the simple explanation that since he looks so different, that he is just a different person?
It's the easiest way to explain the situation.
Forensics guys can say what they like. That's appeal to authority.
He looks different. He triggers the facial recognition systems of many autists on GAW. Me included.
Given the weird state the world is in, an information war and what seems to be a sham presidency and devolution, then swapping out Biden is small in comparison and would fit in with all the other deceptions going on. We are in an information war and lying is the norm.
On the evidence we anons have, it is highly improbable that someone who doesn't look like Biden is Biden. That's the prima facie evidence that we have. How can you possibly say that a replacement is improbable? This world is upside down, we are at war.
Wrinkle mapping proves he is the same.
Not at all, you can put wrinkles on a facial prosthesis. You know, like Gimli or Lt. Worf
Same People? No way.
1
2
Proof:
This is not research.
Additional research: Plastic surgeon Dr. Steven Davis told OK in October of 2020: "Joe Biden definitely had a facelift. "After reviewing photos over the years the scars along the ear cartilage (tragus) are being pulled outward... most likely at least a year or so old." Dr. Barry Cohen, a Washington DC plastic surgeon, told the Washington Examiner: "Without any question, Joe Biden had hair transplants. In fact, he had bad plugs years ago." "Subsequently, he filled in his frontal hairline to camouflage the bad 'Barbie doll-esque' plugs." "I suspect he has regular Botox and probably filler. If he had a facelift, he needs another." Cohen said that he did not expect Biden to face scrutiny for his procedures because they are now common. He added: “No one cares"
Quoting MSM is not research.
Facial wrinkle mapping is.
Where is it? that gif you posted? That doesn't seem like any kind of evidence i can look at and decide for myself. I don't think the date range of the photos you're looking at is wide enough.
Lol! 40 years of range!
The use of body doubles in politics is extremely commonplace. Here's an excellent post on the subject: https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNirUk3X/body-doubles-are-lot-more-common/c/
With that in mind, I find the explanation that Joey received egregious amounts of plastic surgery to look like a completely different person less likely than the body double idea.
President Trump has even alluded to this on multiple occasions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adbJipdw6nc
They are body doubles because up close they aren't the same. Also doubles fail with facial wrinkle mapping
You need to look into masks and deepfake technology. Even conventional, publicly available deepfake technology can reproduce a wrinkle map with stunning accuracy.
Back in the days of, say, Hitler or Stalin they might have relied on simple body doubles. Photographs were low enough resolution that they could get away with decoy actors who were far from perfect.
Nowadays, it's more likely that doubles are augmented. Just watch the above clip of President Trump:
0:47 "Did you ever see a man that likes a mask as much as him?" [gestures at ENTIRE face, not just the mouth region - truth in plain sight]
Makes do not stand up to close inspection at all, they don't contain the correct fine wrinkles either. Deep fakes? So noone ever sees biden in person? Even when he fell off his bike?
Masks hold up to inspection just fine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0uAh02-vPU
I would love to see your evidence to the contrary.
No one is performing wrinkle map analysis on Biden during live events. A political decoy and/or a mask would do the job just fine, especially when you consider how few people would bother to attend any of his garbage events.
You ever notice how most political footage is so heavily compressed that it looks like it was shot on a cellphone from the 90s? There's a reason for that. The type of pictures you want to scrutinize in great detail are few and far between - they pull out all the stops on those special occasions.
https://youtu.be/Q0uAh02-vPU?t=136 No they don't I can use your own source. Also put this on a person and have them smile.
Why don't we find some high quality images of his eyes. He has been alive longer then cameras have been around. Find best 80's, 90's, ..., photos direct on and look at the iris.
That should work right?
Close enought to map the eye? Doubtful.
I'm not intelligent enough to comment on this. But, good thread. Thanks.
I have doubt. the fact so many criticize my doubt reminds me of the obama certificate of live birth. was that real? no, it was a proven fake, yet the truth to that was buried. so many small things have been pointed out, yet no REASONABLE explanation has been given why those small things have occurred/been exposed. that is all I need. if you think he is the real deal, great. show me he is the real deal, you know, with maybe a dna test...oh wait...can you get real dna samples, or would they be faked? you go be you. we will stay here and be us. thanks, bye.
Perfect example of a delusion. Even a DNA test wouldn't prove it to you.
tell me how you could be absolutely sure with a dna test? would you be responsible for taking the samples? would you be able to track the samples through the entire process? who are you trusting to do all this? I would say you are delusional if you are trusting the establishment these days. maybe just go back to reddit, you should be more comfortable there, since you like to throw around disparaging comments.
There is literally nothing that will convince you, that is by definition delusional
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/delusion
A delusion is a belief that is based on an inaccurate interpretation of reality, despite the availability of clear evidence to the contrary.
SHOW ME THE CLEAR EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY. you have not done so. hence you are deluded that you have clear evidence.
Facial wrinkle mapping is as unique as a fingerprint. Not even two adult identical twins have the same mapping. That is the evidence
there is something that will convince me. absolute truth. can you show absolute truth of the situation and prove it?
Give me an example that would suffice to prove he is Not replaced.
I am supposed to come up with your evidence to prove this? that is your argument here.
No, I'm asking you for an example of what sort of evidence you would consider to be absolute proof. Not the evidence itself.
Its just annoying to have this pop up so many times and get stickied, seeing so much energy going to something that cannot be proven.
disprove it if you can and people might stop posting about it. MY ARGUMENT on this is it cannot be disproven at this point either. you are as delusional as you claim others are. I also would wonder if you believe there was significant election fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
obviously you dont listen to the opposing side of a debate. I asked you can you get a dna sample that is trusted to be biden? can you get a test result from a trusted lab that would prove your conclusions? in this day and age, I say you cannot. that is what I mean by not trusting a dna test. but you dont listen then claim others are not listening to you. hence YOUR delusion.
lol. okay so you do trust DNA results just non that are made by anyone?
explain to me the principle of chain of evidence.
no.
I brought this up to six weeks ago or something like that, and people laughed at me.
looked at this facial mapping evidence of OP's and stand still doubtful. find more evidence. calling people names is not a convincing argument, you are not the msm, so please try harder. also explain how you would go about conducting a conclusive dna test if that would be you end all proof biden is biden. until then, I remain doubtful.