I had a thought about Darnkness and 10 days dark
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
As far as I can tell the Election machines need an internet connection to determine how the vote should be changed in almost real time. What if we kill the internet on Election night? Darnkness. Does their system fail? What if we had Milions of IP adresses prepared for a misdirection or modification of data? Funny thing is is that with Starlink many around the world would still be on line the whole 10 days. Just thinking out loud. Any thoughts?
What if they turned off the normal internet but kept StarLink up and running?
StarLink would then channel all election-related data into a vault and let the rest of Earth's internet go where it will.
Next day, everything is turned back on and the vault is used as evidence.
Do you think the whole world outside of the US uses Starlink for internet?
I don't think you understood what was written.
It would be possible for those who control the Internet backbone to easily reroute all local, state and federal government Internet traffic through StarLink, or any path they so desired, for that matter, before it reached its final destination. Copies of all packets could be captured and retained as evidence as part of that rerouting process.
First of all, what is the Internet backbone?
What is the internet backbone and how it works
The internet generates massive amounts of computer-to-computer traffic, and insuring all that traffic can be delivered anywhere in the world requires the aggregation of a vast array of high-speed networks collectively known as the internet backbone, but how does that work?
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3532318/what-is-the-internet-backbone-and-how-it-works.html
Archived link - https://archive.ph/wip/VI6ki
Guess who controls the Internet backbone?
This article was written by the ACLU in 2015 after it filed a lawsuit against the NSA-
The NSA Has Taken Over the Internet Backbone. We're Suing to Get it Back
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy/nsa-has-taken-over-internet-backbone-were-suing-get-it-back
Archived link - https://archive.ph/7fUn7
Any guesses on how that that lawsuit went before I fill you in?
Wikimedia v. NSA went absolutely nowhere.
The case was originally was filed in 2015, and Wikimedia was told they "lacked standing" from the district court. Sound familiar?
Wikimedia appealed that ruling and in May 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled Wikimedia did have standing to pursue its case and sent it back to the lower court.
https://www.aclu.org/cases/wikimedia-v-nsa-challenge-upstream-surveillance-under-fisa-amendments-act
Archived link - https://archive.ph/O3GRf
Once the case was sent back to the district court, it was tossed out a second time, this time due to “state secrets privilege”.
The ACLU appealed again, and in September 2021, this is what happened-
Federal Appeals Court Dismisses ACLU Challenge to NSA Internet Surveillance
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/09/15/federal-appeals-court-dismisses-aclu-challenge-to-nsa-internet-surveillance/
Archived link - https://archive.ph/lwF0n
u/lonewulf
Do you remember those articles I sent you about ICANN and Q talking about why Obama tried to hand over control of the internet? What do you think in this context?
SemperSupra, would you post those links here or in a brand new thread? You are describing some details I don't think I am aware of. Thanks