I had a thought about Darnkness and 10 days dark
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
As far as I can tell the Election machines need an internet connection to determine how the vote should be changed in almost real time. What if we kill the internet on Election night? Darnkness. Does their system fail? What if we had Milions of IP adresses prepared for a misdirection or modification of data? Funny thing is is that with Starlink many around the world would still be on line the whole 10 days. Just thinking out loud. Any thoughts?
I don't think you understood what was written.
It would be possible for those who control the Internet backbone to easily reroute all local, state and federal government Internet traffic through StarLink, or any path they so desired, for that matter, before it reached its final destination. Copies of all packets could be captured and retained as evidence as part of that rerouting process.
First of all, what is the Internet backbone?
What is the internet backbone and how it works
The internet generates massive amounts of computer-to-computer traffic, and insuring all that traffic can be delivered anywhere in the world requires the aggregation of a vast array of high-speed networks collectively known as the internet backbone, but how does that work?
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3532318/what-is-the-internet-backbone-and-how-it-works.html
Archived link - https://archive.ph/wip/VI6ki
Guess who controls the Internet backbone?
This article was written by the ACLU in 2015 after it filed a lawsuit against the NSA-
The NSA Has Taken Over the Internet Backbone. We're Suing to Get it Back
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy/nsa-has-taken-over-internet-backbone-were-suing-get-it-back
Archived link - https://archive.ph/7fUn7
Any guesses on how that that lawsuit went before I fill you in?
Wikimedia v. NSA went absolutely nowhere.
The case was originally was filed in 2015, and Wikimedia was told they "lacked standing" from the district court. Sound familiar?
Wikimedia appealed that ruling and in May 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled Wikimedia did have standing to pursue its case and sent it back to the lower court.
https://www.aclu.org/cases/wikimedia-v-nsa-challenge-upstream-surveillance-under-fisa-amendments-act
Archived link - https://archive.ph/O3GRf
Once the case was sent back to the district court, it was tossed out a second time, this time due to “state secrets privilege”.
The ACLU appealed again, and in September 2021, this is what happened-
Federal Appeals Court Dismisses ACLU Challenge to NSA Internet Surveillance
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/09/15/federal-appeals-court-dismisses-aclu-challenge-to-nsa-internet-surveillance/
Archived link - https://archive.ph/lwF0n
There have been videos by Black Pigeon speaks of the internet being erased. What if the internet is not being erased, but chunks are being taken offline. It's a shutdown that doesn't look like a shut down. Q said "Net will be paused" and "HAMMER"
Shutting down the internet would cause a panic. Many need the internet for running their business or communication. Causing a panic would be bad for white hats.
Lately I've noticed searches are crap after 5-6 pages and you get strange filler websites that don't seem like real websites at all.
I was discussing this with u/lonewulf and he has some good input.
Theoretically, could you shut down the internet in a way that goes mostly unnoticed by the sheep. On the surface the internet seems fine, but all the meat has been removed. You essentially leave enough up for the sheep to use its infrastructure, but the dark web where the criminal activities operate are shut down and cleaned out.
Maybe an internet shut down wouldn't be a big event like we expect. Maybe they'd keep a "shell" of it going to prevent mass panic. It would be like "Weekend At Bernie's" the internet edition.
Dead? No, Bernie looks fine. See? He's taking a nap in the beach chair.
Shut down? No, the internet looks fine. See everything still seems to be there. Just less of it...and it's a little lifeless.
"Lately I've noticed searches are crap after 5-6 pages and you get strange filler websites that don't seem like real websites at all"
This intrigued me...I tested it and confirmed.
You should check out Google's video search. It has gone to utter shit. I mean complete garbage bad.
I generally make it a rule to avoid anything to do with that organisation, but will check it out.
I like this idea. Yet I grew up without internet way before it and life was wayyy simpler. We didn’t know anything was missing since it wasn’t there yet. Seriously, couldn’t we just do without it?!
In a lot of respects, the internet is like brain cells connected by synapses. Each cell (computer) is independent on its own, but when connected by synapses it provides the ability to communicate with all of the the other cells (computers).
The protocol for moving packets of data around has been agreed upon by all.
So, I send a request for data, and the request gets passed around until it reaches its destination. The destination retrieves the requested data and sends it back to me in little packets, which get reassembled and put on my computer screen for me to read.
The internet is just the delivery and retrieval system. It's pretty dumb, all in all.
What's important is what is happening at each brain cell (computer). Is it performing a useful function (legitimate business) or is it doing something nefarious (voter fraud, human trafficking, etc.)?
If someone has taken control of the delivery system and can access the data on individual computers, well, that's a lot of power. In theory, one could control the flow of information. Of course, the data isn't just sitting out there unprotected. There are lots of mechanisms in place to protect the data, but that's not to say it can't be hacked into. For every lock, there is a key. For every front door, there's a back door.
Lots of possibilities for what a group of intelligent people could potentially do, especially given that the internet is basically modular. Pull out one piece and replace it with another piece.
Could you control the flow of data? Could you replace/manipulate the data? Could you control what data is viewed and what is not? Sure, why not? There isn't a piece of code in the world that doesn't have a bug or two or three in it. It would just be a question of taking advantage of the situation at hand.
There was no internet porn or internet child trafficking before internet. I’ve no doubt those crime occurred alot, yet perhaps not as rampantly.
u/lonewulf
Do you remember those articles I sent you about ICANN and Q talking about why Obama tried to hand over control of the internet? What do you think in this context?
SemperSupra, would you post those links here or in a brand new thread? You are describing some details I don't think I am aware of. Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWhzHECM9is
Black Pigeon Speaks did a great breakdown. It was stickied a few days ago if you missed it.
As for ICANN, Q goes into that and asks why did Obama do it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICANN
https://futurism.com/control-over-the-internet-no-longer-belongs-to-the-u-s-government
Q post #2305:
Goes into details about John Perry Barlow who wrote an internet Bill of Rights.
Puts who at ease? Criminals? Foreign powers? They were furious about NSA watching them and they used Snowden to make blue skies for the criminal activities.
Very helpful mate; I appreciate it. Have a great day.
Well, if I understand all of this correctly...
There needs to be a governing body that maintains the standards for the internet because all parties must agree on the protocols involved in transmitting and receiving data. Everyone must be speaking the same internet "language" in order to successfully transmit and receive data from one another. IP addresses must be maintained and doled out, as needed.
The question then becomes, who maintains the standards? One would hope control goes to a group of people that understand the ramifications of their decisions and who operate with everyone's best interests at heart. Ah, there's the rub.
Obama handed all of this off to a private California company. Why? Why not keep it within the government, like a bureau of standards, which would seem the most logical route to go?
This is a lot of power to hand off to a private company. Who is overseeing ICANN? What does ICANN stand to gain by having this control? Who is behind ICANN?
Lots of questions here. I don't know enough about ICANN to say.
Thank you for this interesting internet history.