Of course I don't believe that I'm right about everything. I do, however, put as much thought and careful reasoning behind what I believe as I can, and expect others to do the same (especially in this community).

However, in this thread, the people trying to deny that we've been to moon aren't reading what I'm saying. The first person claimed people have told him that we can't go back to the moon. I questioned this notion, pointing out the difference between can't and won't. Then the other person chimed in with a misleading Forbes article. The headline sensationally says we lost the ability to travel to the moon, when the actual article says that we just can't build the original rockets anymore. Those are not the same thing, and it's clear that moon landing deniers take the headline and run with it without stopping to actually understand the article, which didn't refute my point in the slightest the way he thinks it does.

I'm not mad at flat earthers and moon landing deniers for believing what they believe, I'm frustrated at the fact that they don't display basic reading comprehension. They cherry pick data and headlines to support their beliefs, and put forward exceptionally irrational arguments. None of these practices are healthy for the Q/Truther movement; it will decrease our ability to accurately pursue truth, and turn away those who take a look at this movement and witness such lack of basic reasoning.