PROOF Apollo 11 was 100% REAL!! š¤ Bitchute link. Start watching at 1:45
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
What would you reckon is the most accurate model for our world?
Hollow Earth. It is backed up by math and explains why satellites never go directly over the poles, why there are no satellite images of the South Pole Station, and why the Inuit and Taymyr cultures both believe in a warm paradise to the north, where there is only ice and cold (supposedly) for thousands of miles.
The only website that really talks about it is Biblioteca Pleyades. It's a lot to digest but for geography nerds like me it's a treasure trove.
I find the hollow earth theory fascinating. Very interesting to consider the Inuit and Taymyr legends.
If I recall correctly, at one point drilling one of those super deep holes in Russia, they struck salt water? The ocean on the inside? Very interesting.
Also in certain NASA experiments (so take with a grain of salt), they were able to demonstrate that in zero g, spinning bodies of water will form voids in the center, perhaps due to centrifugal force. Perhaps the same happens with planetary bodies?
There are two books I recommend on this subject.
The Kingdom of Agarttha, and the Smoky God.
Also Rear Admiral Richard Byrd wrote about hollow earth in his lost journal later published by his son. Absolutely fascinating perspective.
Iron republic , also good read
Hey thank you
Describing the shape of the earth is another topic. Also a way heavier topic for your brain to actually think about. Not because itās too complicated to understand. Itās actually much more simple than the model you have in your head right now.
Iām not trying to brag in any way, but aslong you think in terms of big bang, space, universe, planets etcā¦ than you wonāt be able to understand our true nature and and world weāre living in. Because all of that was designed to deceive us all.
Best way to describe it is, everything is the opposite of what you think it is.
Let me tell you something very simple but also it sounds ver crazy: Thereās No Space
Space only exists in Hollywood movies.
Try to wrap you head around that one first. And ask me more later.
Oh I've heard all of the theories. I find this stuff very interesting.
I'd like to read some elaboration on what you think the model is.
Since Iām autistic about this subject Iāll make another thread later and Iāll tag you in it.
But tell me first!
Would you be able to imagine that this earth itself is actually endless instead of āspaceā itself?
I have a very active imagination and I enjoy analyzing these theories.
My one counterpoint would be to point out the billions of dollars that seem to go towards black budget projects, particularly with the Navy and the Air Force, including several space planes such as the Star-Raker and other, and even more advanced propulsion systems such as the Magnetic disruption field described in regards to the famous TR3-B, the magneto hydrodanamic drives patented by Mr. King, and score upon scores of other questionable reports.
And keep in mind, there are so many eyewitnesses to black triangles it's not even funny. I've even seen one.
Why all the money if there's no way out?
And allow me to answer my own question: Perhaps it's all just air dominance, and perhaps there is no space as you suggest, but rather, shit that's just really high up there. Or it could just be money laundering.
It's an extremely interesting concept, especially when you factor in propaganda programs and long periods of time. As you correctly point out, there is a large decades long effort to communicate to the populace ideas about space. The question is, are those notions springing forth from scientific research or intentional misdirection?
Recall what that one CIA director said about their disinformation campaign.
We've caught NASA lying before, and their antics are sometimes quite hilarious. I particularly enjoy the women using hair gel to make their hair stick straight out in a ridiculous attempt to simulate zero gravity. And also the one individual adjusting the trajectory of another doing a backflip, supposedly in zero gee, by tugging on what appears to be a wire attached to his belt holding him up, like in a Hollywood set. I'm sure you're aware of what I'm mentioning.
If I were a betting man, I would posit that the Earth is a planet, and that their is space, but that the information surrounding space is mostly false. Queue Van Allen radiation belt discussions. Did we go to the Moon? Maybe. Did they show us what happened on the Moon (provided they did actually go)? No. Absolutely not. Why would they? Armstrong is a liar. It's clear as day.
But note I make this claim from my heavily indoctrinated point of view, with imperfect and incomplete information.
Regardless, I would be overjoyed to see you post some more content. I find all of this extremely fascinating.
fake space huh? I dunno. I'm more of an Electric Universe fan myself.
Our world is quite electric, youāre definitely not far from it. In our world the higher you go the more charged electric particles you will find. The lower you go the more less charged particles you will find.
The world is basically like gigantic battery with the poles up and down.
When the air is ionized enough lightning can find itās way down to earth.
Exactly right - the earth has its own charge field. Letās of good stuff over on the thunderbolts project channel, I like it bc itās a nice non-political break from info but still interesting and well researched
Satellites are not in space?
Very good question!
Here explains it how they do it š
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTkVjumf/real-satellites-of-nasa-/.
99% of internet goes through under sea cables.
https://youtu.be/yd1JhZzoS6A
And when you point your dish antenna to the sky and get TV, how do you explain that?
The bible and the Jewish have one.