Mat Gaetz pointing out Historical evidence for Current Habbenings !!🤔👍
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
The Battle of Britain (1940) came and went. Hitler could have bypassed that and consolidated his gains in Europe. The attack on Russia (1941) was fateful, and even though "success has many fathers," failures often have a constellation of causes. Had some details of generalship (which Hitler had to intervene and correct) and weather been different, the outcome could have been different. That is war. Hitler made mistakes, but they were not mistakes due to stupidity.
Hitler was also being dosed with amphetemines by Dr. Morell, which accounted for his increasingly erratic decision-making toward the final years of the war. (Parallel with Zelensky, the "Coke-Head of Kiev.")
I'm aware of the Historical connotations, which was the reason I brought it up as an obvious counterpoint to "Hitler was nowhere as stupid as Biden", when clearly, he was. Splitting hairs on HOW stupid, or what factored into both people, is not the issue with the original blanket statement made. The simple general statement that Hitler was nowhere near as stupid, is stupid when looking at the complete general Historical context.
To wit: Biden's been a complete moron his entire career. Hitler made moronic choices that saw a World at War, decimated a continent, countless lives lost, bad strategic and tactical decisions based in a bad case of paranoia and megalomania that ultimately led to his, and Germany's, demise.
So, whats your point?
It just shows me that you don't know much about Hitler. Making mistakes---or bad choices---is not evidence of stupidity, just of being wrong. Which makes me realize you don't know the difference between cognitive capability and historical outcomes.
The statement was made in the same general sense as you made yours.
Resorting to ad-hominem is not the way.
I don't think I was being "general" at all. I was referring to stupidity as a mental deficit, not a "general" term of disapproval (insult). If you can't see that, I'm afraid my statement about being unable to tell the difference between stupidity and bad outcomes is reinforced.
Pointing out an intellectual disconnect is not ad-hominem argument. Can you explain the difference between cognitive capability and historical outcomes? Or do you believe they are the same thing?