👹🐀🎬 Disney Airs Sick Satanic Cartoon “Little Demon” Plot Features Demonic Pagan Rituals and a Single Mom knocked up By Satan 👹🐀🎬
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
The Moloch statue definitely would classify as a graven image, as would a statue of the so-called "Queen of Heaven."
The word translated as "graven image" is pesel or פֶּסֶל.
Pesel means idol or image, a carved image. A statue definitely qualifies, and that's according to the very words out of God's mouth.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h6459/kjv/wlc/0-1/
And relics?
You really believe Sedlec Ossuary is a holy place? Even the chandeliers are constructed from human bones AKA first class relics...
https://unusualplaces.org/sedlec-ossuary-the-gothic-wonder-of-thousands-of-bones/
Sorry, but I don't believe I need the bones or other body parts of a dead saint in the altar for my prayers to reach Yeshua.
Yes, I'm sure you believe in transubstantiation and that I'm a heretic and bastard because I know what the Bible actually says about these things.
From a 15th-century German woodcut of the host desecration by the Jews of Passau, 1477.
The hosts are stolen and sold to the Jewish community, who pierce them in a ritual. When guards come to question the Jews, they (the Jews) attempt to burn the Hosts, but are unsuccessful, as the Hosts transform into an infant carried by angels. The Jews, now proven guilty, are arrested, beheaded, and tortured with hot pincers, the entire community is driven out with their feet bound and held to the fire, and the Christian who sold the hosts to the Jews is punished. At the end the Christians kneel and pray.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_desecration
Well. Your new-age Christian perspective may not believe in the power of relics, but millions upon millions of early Christians that preceded you & your new age religion, did believed in the Holy relics obtained by the Holy Roman Empire. I think it’s cool that Catholic European nobility had these relics & professed their intense devotion to God & country. Even Hitler the Pagan believed in the power of these relics & attempted to collect them. You telling me that Hitler had more faith than in these ancient Christian relics than you! Ain’t that something?
People venerate Saints because they did incredible deeds for the sake of the real faith. Relics Is how people remember the early church & the Christian 1,200 years of history that Protestants chose to forget.
I like authenticity. I simply feel that any man made religion after 1517 lacks substance & authenticity. You really think your gonna get swept away in a rapture? Didnt rapture theology become prevalent in the late 1900’s?
"Rapture theology" AKA Futurism was invented by the Jesuits. Educate yourself.
Sauce? I see Masonry & Rapture theology strictly taught in protestant sects.
I happen to think the Protestant movement was a psyop to weaken & divide Christian Europe. I believe “rapture theology” was another psyop against Christians to simply surrender & hope they get taken away; never putting up a fight.
What I like about Catholicism is that many martyrs were fighters & died for the faith. My personal favorite Saint is Saint George of Palestine. He was a talented soldier that refused to worship the pagan gods of that time. Man, you Protestants are missing out on so much rich Christian history.
When the Protestant Reformation began, men like Luther and Knox claimed that it was the Catholic Church itself who was to be the Antichrist. This made the Pope nervous, and at the Council of Trent, the Pope commissioned the Jesuits to counteract this dangerous idea.
In the late 1500s, two Jesuits, Francisco Ribera and Roberto Bellarmino, came to the Pope’s rescue and created a new Roman Catholic doctrine called Futurism, or Jesuit Futurism. Basically, Jesuit Futurism just says that the Roman Catholic Church can’t possibly have anything to do with the Antichrist. Of course, they wrote it in Latin, which kept it from being a ‘best seller’.
Along comes Chilean-born Manuel Lacunza, a Jesuit priest who found himself with too much time on his hands, because he’d been defrocked. (Remember that part about the Pope disbanding the Jesuits in 1773?) Lacunza built on the ideas of Ribera and Bellarmino by adding that all the good Christians (i.e., Catholics) would be resurrected BEFORE the Antichrist. However, he said that after this ‘rapture’, the Roman Catholic Church would side with the Antichrist.
The Pope liked it, except for the last bit, so he banned it.
Undeterred, Lacunza chose to write in Spanish and publish under the name Rabbi Juan Josafat ben-Ezra. Of course, someone else could have chosen that name, since the book came out in 1811, ten years after he died. Whatever the case, the book gained popularity throughout Spain and eventually wound up in the hands of a Scottish Presbyterian, Edward Irving.
For Irving, it was love at first cite. In fact, he was so taken with the book that he promptly took up the study of Castilian Spanish so that he could translate the book into English. His translation was published in 1827 as “The Coming of the Messiah”. The name ‘Edward Irving’ might sound familiar because he is one of the fore-runners of the Charismatic and Pentecostal movements.
The famous Margaret MacDonald, whose vision(s) created a massive sensation throughout Scotland and Great Britain in 1830, was a member of Irving’s congregation.
Also in 1830, it appears that Irving started preaching that the Rapture will occur in two stages – a secret one before the Antichrist and a public one at the end of the Great Tribulation. The question of which came first, Margaret MacDonald’s vision or Irving’s teaching, gets a little more difficult to figure out.
John Nelson Darby was 30 when news of what was going on hit the headlines. He did his own investigation into the matter and incorporated what he saw into something called Dispensationalism. He also made his own translation of the bible which some say is deliberately biased towards his Dispensationalist views and the theory of the pretribulation rapture.
Darby visited the US six times between 1859 and 1874, preaching Dispensationalism and the pretribulation rapture. He also spent much time preaching in Europe, developing a reputation as an interpreter of bible prophecy.
All this and more, impressed the man that would be the biggest promoter of the Secret Rapture: Cyrus Ingerson Scofield. Scofield, a Kansas lawyer, published the first edition of his famous Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. By 1930, more than one million copies of his Bible were in print.
At this point, it was all over. Literally.
By placing his commentary of the Bible within the Bible itself, he essentially elevated his own thoughts on the Bible to be almost as important as the Bible itself. Whether this was intentional, or not, is immaterial. The fact is that his errors instantaneously became legitimate in the eyes of everyone who read his bible.
With the advent of the Scofield Bible, seminaries became major proponents of the Jesuit Pretribulation Rapture theory.
So, now that you know the shaky foundations of this theory, why not take a moment and look at the Bible itself.
Try to find ANY reference to a ‘Secret Rapture’ in the Bible. You cannot.
Try to find ANY reference in the Bible to a Rapture before Jesus returns. You cannot.
Read Matthew 24. Is there anyone who can explain this chapter in any other way than that the Rapture will occur at the SAME TIME that Jesus returns?
Matthew 24:30
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Can the explanation be any clearer?
Read II Thessalonians 2. Can you explain this away also?
II Thessalonians 2:3
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
Read down through the rest of the chapter. Beware that you do not fall into the category of ‘them that perish’:
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Seriously folks. You must wake up. Stop believing in this Pretribulation Rapture lie and start preparing for what’s coming.
It may already be too late.
https://omegashock.com/2013/02/20/jesuit-pretrib-rapture/