This means whatever is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution is left for the States to decide. This is all I meant.
Yes, but ... I was pointing out that "exclusive federal jurisidiction" is THE AVENUE they use to try to get around the Constitution.
They DO have exclusive jurisdiction (can make all laws) for federal territories and enclaves ONLY ... but they then pretend that it applies to the 50 States, as well.
That's my point: THIS is the method they use to usurp power.
Joe Biden does not have the authority to order abortion at VA hospitals regardless if it is on federal land or not.
Of course, Biden is a resident, not a president, but even if he were legit, executive orders apply ONLY to employees of the Executive Branch of the federal government and NOBODY ELSE. Could he issue a pro-abortion EO for the VA?
Congress makes the federal laws, not the resident/president. So, it would depend on what those statutes say. He couldn't just make up something that Congress had not approved. We agree on that.
Do you know the link between Commerce Clause and CJ John Roberts?
Karl Rove was on the "committee" to interview potential SC appointees during Bush, Jr.'s administration. Rove wrote in his book about the interview of Roberts.
He asked Roberts who his favorite SC justice of all time was. Roberts said it was Robert Jackson.
Jackson is the one who wrote the opinion back in the 1930's that decided that a farmer's crop production came under the Commerce Clause, and therefore subject to federal regulation, because even though the farmer never sold any product across state lines, he COULD HAVE done so. A pure "what if" scenario was the entire basis of claiming that an in-State activity somehow was subject to federal regulation.
That was the camel's nose under the corrupt tent.
And he was Roberts' favorte justice.
It was no suprise (to me), then, when Roberts would later say that a tax on NOT buying a product (health insurance) was constitutional just because it was a tax -- and for no other reason.
These people ARE stupid. Roberts, in particular, is an absolute moron, which is probably why they wanted him in the Chief Justice position (overseeing of the corrupt FISA court).
Their puppet masters have hundreds, if not thousands, of useful idiots who are working full-time in think tanks to come up with all sorts of bizarro world concepts that the puppet masters can use to harm the individual. It is for this reason ONLY that the puppet masters consider themselves "elite." They themselves do nothing, but employ useful idiots to push their agenda.
But the puppets themselves -- the Roberts, Bushes, Clintonistas, Odumbas, and the rest -- are STUPID people, as well as useful idiots.
They couldn't argue their way out of a paper bag on any substantive issue, and it is only the dumbing down of the masses that has allowed them to get away with their crimes.
Commerce Clause is a great example of how they bastardize the basic language and concepts of the Constitution (and Declaration of Independence) to engage in their criminal activity.
And to me it the biggest issue of federal overreach. Much of the attack against the 2nd Amendment is under the abuse and overreach of the Commerce Clause. It seems things like this are copied in other countries. This is an indication it is a international cabal orchestrated scheme. Canada is a good example of this. I recall the story of Rick Simpson, who had a cure for cancer using cannabis oil. He cured his own cancer and started to cure his friends cancer. He never took a single payment; not a red cent from anyone. All they had to do was ask and he'd give them a bottle of the cannibis oil that made from cannabis that grew on his Nova Scotia property. We use to call this ditch weed because that's where you'd find it.
Anyway, word got out and the Canadian medical industry came after him. They harassed him terribly and since it was a home remedy, there wasn't a Canadian medical law that they could use against Rick Simpson. So, they charged him with trafficking a product without a license. This sounded ridiculous because he wasn't selling it or was it ever 'sold' across provincial borders. This didn't stop the corrupt courts though. They ruled even products never sold fell under commerce activity. He was found guilty for 'selling' a product without a license, despite never selling any of it.
The power to misinterpret the original intent of the law is the power to abuse authority. This is what the Commerce Clause is.
I'm going to ask something of you. It's a bit of a big ask, in that it is time consuming, so if you don't have time or don't want to, I understand.
But since you have an interest in law, and the corruption involved, I would be interested in your take on what Robert Fox had to say about his experiences.
There are 6 videos, each around 2 hours long, and it can be frustrating a bit because he gets sidetracked a lot, but there are tons of hidden gems in what he had to say.
I think this information could be a valuable tool towards getting things back on track. Interested in your take:
Yes, but ... I was pointing out that "exclusive federal jurisidiction" is THE AVENUE they use to try to get around the Constitution.
They DO have exclusive jurisdiction (can make all laws) for federal territories and enclaves ONLY ... but they then pretend that it applies to the 50 States, as well.
That's my point: THIS is the method they use to usurp power.
Of course, Biden is a resident, not a president, but even if he were legit, executive orders apply ONLY to employees of the Executive Branch of the federal government and NOBODY ELSE. Could he issue a pro-abortion EO for the VA?
Congress makes the federal laws, not the resident/president. So, it would depend on what those statutes say. He couldn't just make up something that Congress had not approved. We agree on that.
Very true. And the abuse of the Commerce Clause is a favorite tool. I think it was Clarence Thomas who rightfully said it needs to be reigned in.
Do you know the link between Commerce Clause and CJ John Roberts?
Karl Rove was on the "committee" to interview potential SC appointees during Bush, Jr.'s administration. Rove wrote in his book about the interview of Roberts.
He asked Roberts who his favorite SC justice of all time was. Roberts said it was Robert Jackson.
Jackson is the one who wrote the opinion back in the 1930's that decided that a farmer's crop production came under the Commerce Clause, and therefore subject to federal regulation, because even though the farmer never sold any product across state lines, he COULD HAVE done so. A pure "what if" scenario was the entire basis of claiming that an in-State activity somehow was subject to federal regulation.
That was the camel's nose under the corrupt tent.
And he was Roberts' favorte justice.
It was no suprise (to me), then, when Roberts would later say that a tax on NOT buying a product (health insurance) was constitutional just because it was a tax -- and for no other reason.
These people ARE stupid. Roberts, in particular, is an absolute moron, which is probably why they wanted him in the Chief Justice position (overseeing of the corrupt FISA court).
Their puppet masters have hundreds, if not thousands, of useful idiots who are working full-time in think tanks to come up with all sorts of bizarro world concepts that the puppet masters can use to harm the individual. It is for this reason ONLY that the puppet masters consider themselves "elite." They themselves do nothing, but employ useful idiots to push their agenda.
But the puppets themselves -- the Roberts, Bushes, Clintonistas, Odumbas, and the rest -- are STUPID people, as well as useful idiots.
They couldn't argue their way out of a paper bag on any substantive issue, and it is only the dumbing down of the masses that has allowed them to get away with their crimes.
Commerce Clause is a great example of how they bastardize the basic language and concepts of the Constitution (and Declaration of Independence) to engage in their criminal activity.
And to me it the biggest issue of federal overreach. Much of the attack against the 2nd Amendment is under the abuse and overreach of the Commerce Clause. It seems things like this are copied in other countries. This is an indication it is a international cabal orchestrated scheme. Canada is a good example of this. I recall the story of Rick Simpson, who had a cure for cancer using cannabis oil. He cured his own cancer and started to cure his friends cancer. He never took a single payment; not a red cent from anyone. All they had to do was ask and he'd give them a bottle of the cannibis oil that made from cannabis that grew on his Nova Scotia property. We use to call this ditch weed because that's where you'd find it.
Anyway, word got out and the Canadian medical industry came after him. They harassed him terribly and since it was a home remedy, there wasn't a Canadian medical law that they could use against Rick Simpson. So, they charged him with trafficking a product without a license. This sounded ridiculous because he wasn't selling it or was it ever 'sold' across provincial borders. This didn't stop the corrupt courts though. They ruled even products never sold fell under commerce activity. He was found guilty for 'selling' a product without a license, despite never selling any of it.
The power to misinterpret the original intent of the law is the power to abuse authority. This is what the Commerce Clause is.
I'm going to ask something of you. It's a bit of a big ask, in that it is time consuming, so if you don't have time or don't want to, I understand.
But since you have an interest in law, and the corruption involved, I would be interested in your take on what Robert Fox had to say about his experiences.
There are 6 videos, each around 2 hours long, and it can be frustrating a bit because he gets sidetracked a lot, but there are tons of hidden gems in what he had to say.
I think this information could be a valuable tool towards getting things back on track. Interested in your take:
Part 1 of 6 --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/q6PMqMMSasLW/