Pardon me for mentioning what may already be looming in everyone's minds, but I haven't seen it discussed yet and thought I would throw a seed crystal into the supercooled medium of this page.
I am not a Q fanatic, so I take no arrows for being imprecise in my reference, but I seem to recall that Q placed a specific emphasis on how the "First Arrest" would have galvanizing significance.
In light of recent events, I would float the speculation that the First Arrest will be of President Trump.
It has some interesting explanatory power. First of all, if Trump is in a state of "devolved" authority, being arrested by an occupying foreign power is probably a "red line" that would finally trigger military countermeasures. Secondly, it would fit exactly well with the entire document scenario (a tar-baby trap with the documents as bait) and Trump's seemingly strange ebullience over the whole subject, as though he is itching for the trap to spring. The "trap" in this case being his arrest and getting the Deep State to cross the Rubicon that his Presidential Executive Orders anticipated.
There may be more along the same theme, but I think fellow anons can grab this bone and chew on it. Please do so. I would love to see if I am on the right beam.
It would also solidify Trump as guilty of everything the media accuses him of in the mind of wavering normies, so it's a very dangerous game for Q team to play if they go down that road.
And it wouldnt be a good look for the MIL to step in to unarrest "a billionaire who tried to overturn an election" in the minds of normies etc
As I mentioned, Trump conspicuously does not appear concerned over danger. But it does seem to be a game and he evidently thinks he has the winning hand. What game? What hand? That remains to be seen.
I have no use for "wavering normies." These are people who are just as likely to stay home from the polls. If someone has to "waver" over a choice between America First and the One-World Progressive Dogma, they cannot tell the difference between right and wrong. Just write them off as being useful idiots (which they are). The Progressives are not in the majority. They try assiduously to promote that view---but they are inveterate LIARS. We, least of all, should not take any heed of that view.
wavering normies are crucial dude
Somebody who "wavers" between depravity and decency, corruption and integrity? Is someone who doesn't know what is important in life. They are out there, but it is unimportant to pander to them. In fact, it is deadly to do so.