Pardon me for mentioning what may already be looming in everyone's minds, but I haven't seen it discussed yet and thought I would throw a seed crystal into the supercooled medium of this page.
I am not a Q fanatic, so I take no arrows for being imprecise in my reference, but I seem to recall that Q placed a specific emphasis on how the "First Arrest" would have galvanizing significance.
In light of recent events, I would float the speculation that the First Arrest will be of President Trump.
It has some interesting explanatory power. First of all, if Trump is in a state of "devolved" authority, being arrested by an occupying foreign power is probably a "red line" that would finally trigger military countermeasures. Secondly, it would fit exactly well with the entire document scenario (a tar-baby trap with the documents as bait) and Trump's seemingly strange ebullience over the whole subject, as though he is itching for the trap to spring. The "trap" in this case being his arrest and getting the Deep State to cross the Rubicon that his Presidential Executive Orders anticipated.
There may be more along the same theme, but I think fellow anons can grab this bone and chew on it. Please do so. I would love to see if I am on the right beam.
My assessment is that it would not be allowed to go beyond arrest. If there is a plan. Otherwise, the outcome would be tantamount to there being no plan.
Well, if "it had to be this way" means more than just skirting disaster and hardship..
Maybe this is the wrong take, but we still don't know what water to watch. People say Maxwell was the first indictment according to Q, and I've not seen the drop where this is stated, and we don't know which arrest confirms future direction. And it's quite possible those two statements are unrelated to each other.
So, how do you introduce evidence legally when judges determine what evidence is pertinent to a case? How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public? What trial would have the most eyes on it in the history of the world, at this point..
We know they have nothing from the MAL raid, and at best, they have a process crime. But that didn't stop impeachment 1 and 2.
The Mar-a-Lago raid isn't over yet. We have seen the FBI's willingness to fabricate evidence already in this affair. If we grant that the Deep State are desperate to find anything that could be used, then they are desperate enough to contrive something that could be used.
As for the Q clues, I now regard them as riddles, to be understood in retrospect (future proves past).