For those here who want to dig deeper into the lies presented by mainstream (i.e. government-funded) science, these are some pretty damning video presentations.
Forget that PCR is not a valid diagnostic tool (it is not), but it might not even be a valid replication tool, either:
https://rumble.com/v1helnt-everything-you-need-to-know-about-pcr-tests-tom-cowan.html
Digging even deeper, recent findings show that DNA is NOT the same in every cell in the body -- and "Does DNA really exist?" turns out to be a valid question, too. DNA follows the same fake science as PCR and viruses -- NOTHING is taken directly from the human body to be studied, but rather ALL of it is a MIXING of human tissue with chemicals that do not exist in the body -- and then the final product is ASSUMED to have some sort of profound meaning.
https://rumble.com/v1hglvt-genetics-dna-and-rna-webinar-by-tom-cowan-aug.-26-2022.html
In part of that 2nd video, Stefan Lanka explains that 25 geneticists at UC Berkley could not figure out a simple question: "What is a gene?" Their meeting ended in shouting and accusations, and no science. He says that geneticists have disproven their own theories, but have not told virologists or the public.
This would mean that DNA tests, paternity tests, forensic criminal DNA tests, genetic ancestry tests, so-called genetic illnesses ... are ALL suspect as being completely bogus and not scientific in any way.
Mind-blowing stuff.
That was Beuchamp's original concept, was it not?
So true.
And ... although light years ahead, he is quoting from a conference in 2008.
It is KNOWN by a select few, but they are criminals in covering up the truth.
One thought that comes to my mind is this: What if I were somehow involved in a legal case, and it came down to the other side claiming something related to DNA, using "experts" who are drunk on the mainstream Kool-Aid, and then I have to unravel all the bull shit wrapped in horse shit, wrapped in a nice smelling rose.
How the HELL would any attorney, judge, or juror understand that it is lies on top of lies on top of lies?
And THAT might be the biggest problem of all.
"We [the CIA] will know our mission is complete, when everything the American public believes is false." -- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan.
I always thought that statement (if valid) was weird. Could not understand why he would say that.
Now, I do.
Lies >> Confusion >> Manipulation >> Control >> Power >> Money >> More Power >> More Money >> Ad Infinitum
You're way ahead of the curve Mag!
Yes. Somatids was the name given to the same particles by the second man (after Royal Rife's life was destroyed) to invent a dark field microscope that could actually view real-time activity at the sub-microscopic level, Gaston Naessans. His life was destroyed too, first by the French medical system, then the Canadian medical system. Naessans is still alive but is very old now and keeps a low profile as he's been threatened numerous times following his trial.
Other researchers also found these "tiny, indestructible particles" including Gunther Enderlein, who called them "Protits" and Wilhelm Reich who called them "Bions". Royal Rife saw them too with his microscope and called them "Viruses" because that was the official scientific definition for "living particles smaller than a bacteria" in the 1930s. Ain't it fun how they change up the meanings of words and then laugh at the unsuspecting sheeple who will never figure out their trickery? Viruses went from "A Toxic/Noxious substance" in ancient Latin, to later "living particles smaller than a bacteria" during the onset of "germ theory (circa 1870-1940) to their current definition -> "a strand of DNA/RNA with a protein coating". If you didn't know this ahead of time, you'd just assume humans have always thought "viruses" were exactly what people think they are today.
Anyway, these tiny particles, whatever you wish to call them - Microzymas/Protits/Bions/Viruses/Somatids are literally the BASIS OF LIFE. You could call them the "God particle" if you will. Bechamp figured this out in the 1880 time frame. He realized they were indestructible, neither heat, cold nor poisoning could destroy them. They simply morph from their basic form into everything "alive" that there is. Naessans made drawings as well as captured actual video through is somatoscope (dark field microscope) demonstrating their pleomorphic life cycle into all the various shapes and forms of bacteria, returning back to their simplest form all throughout the body. I happen to believe that these microzymas are really what modern medicine is calling "stem cells" today and that they are the very "things" that morph into all of our cells, tissues and organs as well. Thus, they are the 'basis of life" and not the "cell" as we've all been taught. In short, the cell nucleus and mitochondria are simply microzymas wrapped in a sheath for a period of time.
EggZachary! Everybody is pre-programmed with their "blind trust in authority", the judges most of all. This is just one more aspect of Steve Kirsch's "virus challenge" that makes it ludicrous. He wanted to hire 3 retired judges to be the final arbiter of "truth". I counter-proposed Steve telling him I wanted 3 people under 40, with strong spiritual foundations as my judges as it's my contention that only people with a deep sense of their spiritual nature are able to discern ACTUAL TRUTH!
I think you're right. Comfortable lies trump uncomfortable truths every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
I remember the first time I read that back in my early "conspiracy theory" days and thinking, "well, that's partially right". I changed my assessment around 2015 recognizing that Casey was almost COMPLETELY right.
As I like to say nowadays, THEY (controlling cabal) are lying to us about everything that gives them some sort of a distinct advantage over us that we cannot easily verify for ourselves.
In the medical/scientific realm, that means virtually everything at the fine/subtle levels. I read through the leading anatomy/physiology book for medical students a few years back and came to the conclusion that it contains roughly 20% truths, being mostly gross anatomy and obvious physiology, 40% half-truths being the crossover areas from gross to subtle, and 40% outright lies at the subtle levels that are impossible to verify thanks to the destruction of Royal Rife and Gaston Naessans lives and technical achievements with dark field microscopes. And I believe these ratios generally hold true in most other fields as well.
"Idiocracy" was a documentary and we're living at the height of it right now!! Long live Gatorade!