I'm no expert or biochem guy so I'll do my best with their lingo.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
So I assume when they say
2/8- It demonstrates through elegant structl & biochem expmts what was observed with seq alignements (below): Large genome RNA virus RNA polymerases (eg. CoVs) evolved an active site adapted to increase speed yet maintain fidelity
They mean it in a way of replicating/evolving faster while still remaining stable organism.
3/8- It makes a clear connection between active site evolution of small genome RNA viruses (eg., enteroviruses) towards large genome RNA viruses (eg., CoVs). Swapping key active site residues confers the required properties to expand and maintain large RNA genomes.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
4/8- This work expands the seminal discoveries (12 years ago !) of the @PeersenLab about the specific fidelity check of viral RNA polymerases, which is totally different from that of DNA polymerases. A MUST read...
Apparently it expands research on evolutionary stability whereas prior research with RNA was only concerned with DNA
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
That is the claim ... but it might not actually be true. It might be simply creating material that did not previously exist, and not making copies of what already existed. And this from a soup of mixed genetic material, none of which is specifically identified via isolation and purification as a so-called "virus."
If you understood how PCR works, you would see the deception:
Done "in silico" (in a computer software program -- i.e. theoretical), and NOT done in physical reality.
while still remaining stable organism
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing (which means it is not an organism) -- according to virologists.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
Sars 2 did not "evolve." It's so-called genome was computer-generated (not something physically observed in the real world), from Sars 1, which was also computer generated (not something physically observed in the real world), which in turn was computer-generated from something else that was not real.
Just a big ol' circle jerk of fake, computer-generated pretend stuff.
You stupid idiot I actually worked on the machines that used PCR to copy DNA for sequencing, years ago in a previous job.
And this from a soup of mixed genetic material
ALL GENETIC MATERIAL IS DNA OR RNA BASE PAIRS YOU FUCKING DIPSHIT WHICH IS WHAT PCR COPIES
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing
IT HAS DNA OR RNA IN IT. ITS NOT CONSIDERED LIFE BECAUSE IT MUST HAVE A HOST IN ORDER TO LIVE AND CREATE NEW VIRUSES. A VIRUS CANNOT LIVE ON ITS OWN, ITS JUST A BLOB OF DNA OR RNA FLOATING AROUND UNTIL IT ATTACHES TO A CELL AND BEGINS TO MAKE COPIES.
I'm no expert or biochem guy so I'll do my best with their lingo.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
So I assume when they say
They mean it in a way of replicating/evolving faster while still remaining stable organism.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
Apparently it expands research on evolutionary stability whereas prior research with RNA was only concerned with DNA
Very good, thank you!
That is the claim ... but it might not actually be true. It might be simply creating material that did not previously exist, and not making copies of what already existed. And this from a soup of mixed genetic material, none of which is specifically identified via isolation and purification as a so-called "virus."
If you understood how PCR works, you would see the deception:
https://rumble.com/v1helnt-everything-you-need-to-know-about-pcr-tests-tom-cowan.html
Done "in silico" (in a computer software program -- i.e. theoretical), and NOT done in physical reality.
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing (which means it is not an organism) -- according to virologists.
Sars 2 did not "evolve." It's so-called genome was computer-generated (not something physically observed in the real world), from Sars 1, which was also computer generated (not something physically observed in the real world), which in turn was computer-generated from something else that was not real.
Just a big ol' circle jerk of fake, computer-generated pretend stuff.
Maybe they will make a unicorn genome next!
You stupid idiot I actually worked on the machines that used PCR to copy DNA for sequencing, years ago in a previous job.
ALL GENETIC MATERIAL IS DNA OR RNA BASE PAIRS YOU FUCKING DIPSHIT WHICH IS WHAT PCR COPIES
IT HAS DNA OR RNA IN IT. ITS NOT CONSIDERED LIFE BECAUSE IT MUST HAVE A HOST IN ORDER TO LIVE AND CREATE NEW VIRUSES. A VIRUS CANNOT LIVE ON ITS OWN, ITS JUST A BLOB OF DNA OR RNA FLOATING AROUND UNTIL IT ATTACHES TO A CELL AND BEGINS TO MAKE COPIES.