Bed Bath & Gustav's plunge might be more than just a depressed CFO. There is connection to GME (and maybe Moass) - The Great Awakening

321

Bed Bath & Gustav's plunge might be more than just a depressed CFO. There is connection to GME (and maybe Moass) ☁️ Bed, Bath & Gustav ☁️

posted 2 years ago by bubble_bursts 2 years ago by bubble_bursts +321 / -0

Acronyms:

CFO - Chief Financial Office

GME - Game Stop (The company that many anons believe will take down the cabal.)

Moass - Mother of all short squeezes (Assuming Wall Street is massively shorting GameStop, a short squeeze would bring down the whole wall street, hence Anons call it MOASS)

RC - Ryan Cohen (Chairman of the board of Game STop)

https://nypost.com/2022/09/04/bed-bath-beyond-exec-gustavo-arnal-faced-1-2b-suit-before-suicide/

A Bed Bath & Beyond exec was facing a $1.2 billion “pump-and-dump” stock-fraud suit when he apparently leaped to his death from his swank 18th-floor apartment in Lower Manhattan last week.

Gustavo Arnal, who was the chief financial officer of BBB, is among the defendants named in a class-action suit that accuses him, Chewy.com founder Ryan Cohen and others of artificially inflating the troubled housewares giant’s share price.

First, it's curious to see Ryan Cohen referred to as "Chewy.com founder". Thats like calling Trump "Creator of Apprentice". RC is the C̶E̶O̶ Chairman of the Board of GME and has been the target of the financial Cabal for a while now.

A few days ago when RC sold shares in BBB and made 68M there was a lot of attack against him by the mainstream.

Even then the news sounded very fishy. Now seeing 68M is nothing compared to a 1.2 billion pump and dump scheme, makes you wonder if there is some elaborate setup going on here. We all know the ultimate target is going to be GME.

Does this have anything to do with the much awaited MOASS and Cabal trying to destroy it before it can happen?

Here is the filing by RC the day before he sold the shares: https://sec.report/Form/144-PAPER/43719

Edit 1: Fixed RC's position, thanks to u/CarbonWinter

Edit 2: Most Anons here have assumed that somehow RC never disclosed his purchase of BBBY options at unusual high price until just before he sold the stocks.

u/xavierschair Just pointed out redditors have known this for months

For those arguing about profits going back to BBBY, here is the Short-Swing Profit Rule

Special shout out to u/MAG768720 for their passion on this topic to the point of motivating long time lurkers to create accounts to debate him. The way of the Anon ;)

Edit 3: Added acronyms as suggested by u/The_Greeatship_Pilot

Edit 4: Added link to RC's filing with SEC his intent to sell.

181 comments

181 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (181)

sorted by:

▲ -2 ▼

– MAG768720 -2 points 2 years ago +1 / -3

OK. I saw 9.8% in another filing.

But of that 11.8%, some was options, which have no voting rights, and would fall under the court exception.

I suppose the stock portion was 9.8% and the options portion was 2% of the 80 million shares outstanding.

9,450,100 total - 1,670,100 options = 7,780,000 stock

If 9,450,100 total was 11.8%, that would mean total shares outstanding were about 80,085,000 or so.

The stock would then be 9.6% and the options would be 2.1%.

So, the stock portion was under the 10%.

The options have no voting rights, and would fall under the exception to the 10% rule.

But we'll see. What if he has to give any profits to BBBY?

So what?

Won't change a damn thing for the company. Maybe pay for a week or two of expenses. Means nothing.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– queue-anon 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

What if he has to give any profits to BBBY? So what? Won't change a damn thing for the company. Maybe pay for a week or two of expenses. Means nothing.

Uh idk, your premise was he was pumping and dumping for his own benefit and thus, he is not to be trusted.