She did interviews explaining her views.
Here is one:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JOokZAC76ylt
Great way to honor her would be to watch it.
Nonsense. But I can see [their] strategy, plain as day.
To remove Kamala, the House would have to impeach and the Senate would have to convict.
Not happening.
If they took out Biden, Kamala becomes prez for a few weeks. She nominates a VP, which must be confirmed by majority vote in both chambers of Congress.
Not likely, though possible.
To me, it seems their plan is to try and leave the VP spot is empty. VP is the "president of the Senate," and that is the person who is required to certify the 2024 election.
What if there is no one holding that office?
No 2024 election certification?
That would be [their] plan.
But my guess is SCOTUS steps in and just says that next in line would perform that function. Next in line would be Senate Pro Tem or Speaker of the House, depending on how SCOTUS would rule.
Of course, SOTH is Mike Johnson.
But who is Senate Pro Tem?
Patty Murray (D-WA).
Who TF is that, right?
Geesh! She's been in the US Senate for 32 years! And I have no clue who she is.
These goblins need to be sent home.
Anyway, I bet that is a strategy the criminals are thinking about.
Side note:
The Egyptians of the pyramids era and the Biblical era were White.
DNA samples show they had red and blond hair, and DNA in common with White Europeans.
The arabs moved in much later, which explains why they have never accomplished anything signficiant. They are not the ones who built those amazing structures.
The Biblical Egyptians were disobeying the Commandments by worshiping other gods, which is why they were punished.
Some of the Israelites returned to Palestine, and some built boats and went north into Greece, which began the next amazing culture of Greek literature, art, and politics.
First, the Egyptians, then the Greeks, then the Romans, then the English, then the Americans. All of the same race.
I don't know the significance of LHO and "to move," but I do know that the real name of "Jack Ruby" was Jacob Rubenstein, and his rabbi related the story that he said he did it for Israel.
Hmm ... now, why would Israel need to be protected from an assassination trial of Oswald?
We're not crying. Were redpilling our people ...
I agree.
If there are non-White races in the world who would like to leech off the success and accomplishments of the White race, one strategy they might use would be to convince Whites to not look at race, to make them think there are no differences; all the while, they themselves do nothing but focus on race as a means of gaining unearned advantages.
Look at the Japanese. They have a long history of being a very Japanese-centric society. It has served them well, until recently when the non-Japanese influences have infiltrated with evil propganda, similar to what has happened in White societies. As a result, they are weakening as a people.
And when I say “demons”, I’m actually not certain that they aren’t just animated flesh husks with demonic animating forces in them. Devil ain’t exactly known for having sympathy or honor.
My thinking has changed a bit on this. I used to think all the dark stuff was a "coincidence." Then, I thought it had to be planned out. Now, I think it might be a third option.
Consider the concept of "Pride Month" -- the use of that specific term.
What do you get when you put the two words together?
priDEMONth
Now ... what are the odds that someone came up with that on purpose vs. by accident?
At first, I thought it had to be on purpose. But that takes a lot of thinking and a lot of trying different combinations of words for the purpose of promoting a hidden message.
Was it purely accident?
Or ... was it that the people who came up with it did so because there is some force within them that made it come out of them? Could such people be satanic by their nature? If so, it would make sense that they would just come up with something random, which also happens to have a dark, hidden message within.
I found something similar with 9/11. I won't go into the full analysis, but I noticed that using the flight numbers, the date, and Building 7, you get a series of numbers: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, with an extra 11. This is using a number system where 13 is the highest number.
Why use this system? Because I think it is used to send messages hidden in plain sight.
What are the odds that this specific series of numbers would be by accident? What are the odds they could arrange it on purpose?
Then, I converted the numbers to letters of the alphabet, rearranged them, and came up with "KEK MAGIC." I looked that up, and it is satanic.
Again, what are the odds that these particular combinations of airline flight numbers, etc. could spell out something satanic?
Planned? That would be a huge thing to arrange, in addition to the operation itself.
Coincidence? Am I just seeing things that are not there?
Or is there some sort of spiritual element -- in this case, something dark -- that made the planners carry it out in this way?
What about the JFK job?
Lee Harvey Oswald = LHO = HOL = Hole in the head.
My imagination?
Trump shot at, turned head at precisely the moment necessary -- to the millisecond -- and walks away with a small cut on the ear, just in time to win an election that could change the world.
It is hard to believe that things like this could be intricately planned. It is also hard to believe that it is nothing but coincidence.
Maybe it is deeper than what we can see on the surface.
We have to take back control of power, then safeguard sovereignty. Running isn’t an option anymore. No more suburbs. No more fleeing to other countries. Stand and FIGHT. Peacefully.
Agreed.
We also have to identify the enemy, and separate ourselves from those who would do us harm.
In the Bible, God told His people to be Holy.
In Hebrew, "holy" means to set apart, or to separate.
History has demonstrated, again and again and again ...
When we follow that command, we have peace.
When we don't, we have turmoil.
Makes sense.
Last time I looked a Federal law over rode a state Governor.
Not true -- UNLESS the specific law is one that is constitutionally authorized for federal government enforcement.
In the case of immigration, it is a federal matter, so the feds enforce it (even though the feds have refused to do so in the past 4 years). I wonder if Kamala Harris, being put in charge of the border will mean she will face life in prison for her aiding and abetting the criminals. Same question for Mayorkas.
Just ask Orval Faubaus when he defied Eisenhower's desegregation order. Federal troops were sent into Little Rock to escort black students to class.
Show me in the Constitution where the federal government was authorized to make or enforce such a law. Eisenhower has been given a free pass due to the WW2 outcome and his famous miltary industrial complex speech, but he was not a good man.
Don't think for a minute Trump and Homan won't toss her butt into FEDERAL jail for a time in order to "get her mind right". They will do it!
I hope so. Hobbs deserves to be locked up for her crimes.
Everybody should read the statute that Homan keeps telling us about:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324
It is very comprehensive.
Basically, anybody who helped or financed the bringing in of any illegal aliens (NGO's), employed them (employers), or protected them from prosecution for illegal entry (city and state governments claiming "sanctuary city" status) are ALL subject to 10 years in prison for EACH violation.
Bring in 10? Get 100 years in prison.
Bring in 100? Get 1,000 years in prison.
If any illegal aliens or any citizens are killed by the illegals, and you helped the illegal?
Death penalty.
Here is a particularly interesting provision of this statute:
(c) Authority to arrest
No officer or person shall have authority to make any arrests for a violation of any provision of this section except officers and employees of the Service designated by the Attorney General, either individually or as a member of a class, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws.
Matt Gaetz decides who makes the arrests, not Katie Hobbs.
This means AG Gaetz can authorize Arizona police officers, sheriff deputies, and individual citizens to make arrests, and the governor of the state CANNOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
So, she is clearly talking out her ass when she says her state will not help.
IT IS NOT HER DECISION.
Another interesting provision changes the Rules of Evidence that would normally apply in a criminal trial, so that witnesses can testify via video recording, rather than show up in the court room:
(d) Admissibility of videotaped witness testimony
Notwithstanding any provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the videotaped (or otherwise audiovisually preserved) deposition of a witness to a violation of subsection (a) who has been deported or otherwise expelled from the United States, or is otherwise unable to testify, may be admitted into evidence in an action brought for that violation if the witness was available for cross examination and the deposition otherwise complies with the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Funny how idiots on a city council think they can make laws about immigration, which the Constitution (which they were required to swear an oath to) clearly states it is a federal power.
These people are beyond stupid.
But they will look great in orange jumpsuits.
One final thought --
You obviously think Hitler was evil.
That is a conclusion you have reached, based on ideas you believe.
Like almost eveyone else, one of those things you believe, which lead you to the conclusion that Hitler was evil, is the Holocaust.
All I am really saying in this thread is that you have to remove the Holocaust as one of your reasons, because the Holocaust is a lie.
The evidence supports my position, not yours.
So, take that one out of your "bag or reasons why I hate Hitler," and then rethink it.
I plan to do some reasearch on the AI translations of Hitler's speeches.
Should be interesting.
Response (2 of 2):
The Bush family was even investigated by Congress for funding his regime during WW2.
The Bush family was/is a crime syndicate.
You will get no argument from me.
Samuel Bush was buddies with Rockefeller and accused of illegal weapons dealing with Germans in WW1.
He and Prescott both were investigated under the Trading with the Enemies Act circa WW2.
Even so, per Versaille treaty, the Allies(Britain and France) were supposed to make sure Germany never rearms itself. If it does, they were supposed to step in and stop it, BY FORCE.
Yes, I know.
But what do we have?
Germany starts rebuilding it's military - crickets
Germany takes back Studetland - crickets
Germany takes Austria - crickets
Germany annexes Czechoslovakia
Reminder: The people who lived in those locations were ethnic Germans, who had lived in "Germany" prior to WW1, and suddenly the borders were moved post-WW1. They wanted to rejoin Germany, and Hitler made it happen.
You think the fact that nobody immediately went to war proves that Hitler was a puppet?
I don't.
There was a Great Depression going on at the time, and no will among the people of Europe or USA to go right back to war again. The was just 10-15 years later.
Now riddle me this? If Germany was facing a monolithic conspiracy from these powers, why did this happen? Why did these powers allow Germany to get even stronger? The math ain't mathin here buddy.
How strong was Germany -- REALLY?
As late as 1941, 75% of the German military supply lines were handled by horses.
The world looked a lot different then vs. now.
England, France, etc. had a tough time convincing anyone, including their own people, that they should go to war just because some Germans were reuniting with their brothers and sisters.
I don't see the hidden story that you do.
Funny how you use a bit of critical thinking, and your argument falls apart.
It is an emotional argument, that's all it is.
I am saying ONE PRIMARY thing:
THE HOLOCAUST WAS AND IS FAKE.
You have provided NO EVIDENCE, NO ARGUMENT, NOTHING AT ALL to refute that, while I posted at least some info from people who have throuroghly researched the topic, and I studied the subject a lot.
We can each make up our own minds, but there is NO QUESTION that this is a fact: YOU HAVE PROVIDED NOTHING BUT RED HERRING AFTER RED HERRING.
You have not even bothered to respond to the subject, so that is the end of the "debate," as I see it.
But but but, the Germans said dei good boyz, they be aryans en shieet. That's all there is to it.
You are a FUCKING LIAR.
I have provided information to back up my claim.
It is YOU who have provided nothing on this subject, and your various other statements (which are unrelated) have nothing to back them up other than your own statements.
I could no find anything on a quick search about Stalin and banning usury -- not that it is releveant at all to this debate, but at least I looked it up.
I doubt you have bothered to look into anything that I have provided.
Your emotional argument belongs on plebbit and not here. Only liberals use emotions to argument their position.
You continue with stupid ad hominems that are not only objectively false, but also an attempt to gaslight and derail the discussion.
Q told us as much. Use questions and think critically. Just because the western media hates Hitler, doesn't mean he was a good guy.
LOL. You don't even see your own self-contradiction.
You can also thank him for having anti-semitic laws.
You mean "anti-jew" laws. Jews are not semites.
And it is the jews who are responsible for those laws, not anyone who died 80 years ago.
And yet the ones that target slavs have a death rate of 60%
Stalin was evil. I already agreed with you on that.
But ... AGAIN ...
That has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT ... that the Holocause was and is a ... LIE.
You have done nothing at all to refute that point.
Here is a quick video of how the noble Germans treated the Soviet POWs. Fair warning, it gets very intense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeRR100incE
The video you cited is very interesting.
First, it is a list of quotes from several books that the creator of the video decided to put into his video.
The time period is 1941, right after Operation Barbarossa.
I watched an interview of Benton Bradberry, who wrote a book about the Germans during the Hitler years. He stated that he was fascinated about this time period and had read dozens of books on the subject.
After awhile, he started to question some of these anti-Hitler books because he would see photos that were claimed to be different things in different books. He would read ridiculous accounts of stories claiming all sorts of things.
He eventually did his own research and wrote his own book.
Some of the quotes in this video are the types he mentioned were just made up. I don't know, and I don't have a lifetime to research it in detail.
I do note that the creator of your video has another video where he is "sounding the alarm" at the "problem" that AI is being used now to translate Adolf Hitler's speeches into other languages, so people can see for themselves what Hitler was acutally saying in those fiery speeches.
Haven't you ever noticed that [they] want you to see his body language when he spoke but [they] don't seem to want to show you what he actually SAID?
That has always puzzled me.
This guy is worried that AI is changing that and spreading Hitler's "harmful ideas to the world." He thinks this is a serious problem.
That tells me his bias, just like Bradberry talked about.
But regardless ...
YOU STILL HAVE PROVIDED NOTHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST.
So, these side stories are interesting, but there is only so much time.
I can go on and on.
I'm sure you can. But I can't.
The problem is that I don't think you'll read most of this comment anyway.
LOL. I respond almost point-for-point.
Unlike you.
Good luck. I see nothing productive from this discussion, since you have spent a lot of time on interesting topics, but not THIS topic that I raised.
Nothing you said addressed the issues of (a) there are NO documents to support any aspect of the Holocaust story, (b) there are documents that DO support the hidden story of the British intel psyop which created the fake Holocaust story, and (c) the jews have been gaslighting you, me, and everyone else for nearly a century, and it is time we learn the truth.
Maybe AI will help in that.
So, thanks for leading me to that tip.
LOL.
Response (1 of 2):
Oh boy, where do I even start with this one? First of you sound like a redditor who got trigerred, bulshit disinfo reee.
And you sound both immature and ignorant.
Starting off with ad hominem only shows your inability to debate a subject.
Second of all, Q called out Nazis
Appeal to authority is also a fallacy and not substance.
Any notion that Hitler was a white hat is smooth brain take.
Again, with immature ad hominem, and nothing of substance on the topic.
Third of all, I actually lived in the USSR.
You did not live there during the Stalin and Hitler years.
I have first hand experience of everything I'm saying. And I can tell you for a fact: people would spit in your face if you attempted to tell them that Hitler tried saving them considering the shit they had to go through.
You and the Russians have been gaslighted and lied to about this topic, just like has been done to the Germans, the Americans, the Brits, and everyone else.
I don't give a FUCK what emotions drive people to irrational thoughts.
I care about what EVIDENCE can be presented to support a claim.
You have presented NONE.
Hitler printed his own money and arrested one of the Rothschilds because he was stealing from the Austrian bank.
So did Stalin. As a matter of fact, during Stalin's reign he attached the ruble to the golden standard and banned usury all together.
I have not looked into the Soviet laws on usury or gold standard.
A quick search turned up a Wiki page about the Soviet Ruble (Russian Ruble was outlawed), where they did have some that were backed by gold and others that were not.
But this is weird:
Stalin failed to maintain the ruble's value versus the gold ruble as early as 1925, and by 1930 its value even struggled to stay above the melt value of the silver 10-, 15- and 20-kopeck coins. Soviet authorities scapegoated "hoarders" and "exchange speculators" as responsible for the shortages, and confiscatory measures were taken. In 1931, the remaining silver coins were replaced with redesigned cupro-nickel coins depicting a male worker holding up a shield which contained the denominations of each. All silver coins were to be returned and melted down.
This implies that any gold standard there was didn't work out so well, which is weird.
I also found a statement by someone claiming to know about usury in the USSR, and he stated that there was interest paid on bank accounts and interest on loans was a complicated system. He also said it didn't matter much because nobody could own any property -- no car purchases, no real estate purchases.
Contrast that to Germany where Hitler created the Volkswagon (the "people's car") for everyone to own one, created the autobahn for everyone to get around the country, and a housing program where everyone could own their own home. For each child born, 1/4 of the mortgage was forgiven. Have 4 children, and you own your own home free and clear.
So, don't feed me anymore bullshit about how Stalin was the same as Uncle Adolph. Slavery in the USSR; freedom in "Nazi" Germany.
Here is an account of a "Hitler Youth" member and what life was like in Germany from 1935-1945:
"Living in Adolf Hitler's Germany" --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iEP3VtQ9ZTbR/
He [Stalin] also executed a lot of zionist jews.
If you are trying to convince me that Stalin was a power-hungry monster, save your typing fingers. I agree. He and Mao were the two most evil monsters in the history of the Earth.
Where I will not agree is if you put Hitler into that same category. Because that would be a bald-faced jewish gaslighted lie.
Remember the cold war ... Stalin refused to sign the Breton Woods treaty.
None of your statements about Stalin have anything to do with the FACT that the Holocaust is a jewish lie.
You argument doesn't make sense considering that the USSR came out stronger post WW2.
You made the claim that Hitler was used as a pawn so Rothschild could "get control back of the USSR" and I pointed out that they already had control.
If your claim is that Stalin later got control of the USSR from the jews and they used Hitler to get it back, I would say that is not likely.
The jewish-controlled Britain and the jewish-controlled USA wanted the jewish-controlled USSR on the Eastern Front so that Germany would be surrounded. They wanted to take out Germany because it had become an economic threat by having such great success under Hitler's economic policy. Germany had become the #1 economy in the world in just 5 years.
If anything Hitler basically handed Stalin all of eastern Europe on a platter.
In hindsight, yes. That is because Stalin double-crossed him.
Stalin's plan was to take over all of Europe, though, and Hitler did stop that.
As for the jews controling Russia,I can tell you right now that they didn't because they were killed. Trotskii, Tukhashevskii, Yagoda, Zinoviev all zionists all purged from the aparatus.
The jews -- not only those in Russia, but also the jewish bankers who funded the operation in New York and London -- were the ones who overthrew the czar and formed the Soviet Union, instituting a system of slavery of the Russian people.
The Russians had no problem with the czar. It was outsiders -- jews and those they hired from other countries -- who did the dirty work of the takeover, and then slaughtered millions of Russians.
If Stalin then gained control though his evil secret police and murderous actions, I will agree.
That does not change the FACT that jews were the ones who overthrew Russia and it was jews who were behind the mass murder of Russians early on, and also during Stalin's years.
But let me tell you what else Stalin did:
Purged the LGBTQ movement- before Weimar and your precious uncle Adolf, the LGBTQ capital of the world was Moscow.
The Weimar Republic in Germany started in 1919 and lasted until Hitler took over in 1933. Stalin came to power in 1922.
If he got rid of the faggots in the 1920's, and if Moscow was the depravity capital of Europe at that time, it is only because the jews were the ones in control until Stalin walked in the door.
Then they must have moved their depravity to Berlin, which became the new European capital of degeneracy, until Hitler walked in the door.
NONE OF THIS has anything to do with YOUR CLAIM that Hitler was some sort of puppet of Roth. In fact, this only shows the similarities of Stalin and Hitler regarding cleaning up the degeneracy.
But their similarities are few. Hitler's Germany was a paradise compared to Stalin's USSR.
Something you like to say Hitler did and always give him props for it. Funny how when a different dictatorship does it, it's all crickets.
I have not looked into Stalin nearly as much as I have Hitler.
The lies about Stalin are to make him look good when in fact he was evil.
The lies about Hitler are to make him look evil when in fact he was good.
Big difference -- at least, to me.
Decriminalized christianity- Stalin was an ex-priest himself who became disilussioned with the church hierarchy. Up until WW2 being a Christian would land you in jail. Post WW2, everyone was allowed to be a Christian. Not as freely as the west mind you, it was a dictatorship after all.
OK.
Banned usury and predatory loans - all USSR citizens were debt free.
All USSR citizens were FUCKING SLAVES.
NO PROPERTY.
So, who cares about interest?
All services were free as well. They had no income tax as well.
The same could be said of the slaves in Mississippi in 1820.
the commies reinforced national pride as being part of the collective.
That would be counter to communism, as communism demands conformity.
See: China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea.
You want me to believe that the USSR was a special brand of communism? I don't.
I grew up with no porn, no drugs, no fluoride in my water, no lgbtq propaganda, no violence or sex on tv.
So did I. And my parents could own a house.
They could also leave their country and travel around the world.
The Soviets could not.
As you can imagine, it was a very nice period to live in, and 80% of Russian will agree with me on that.
Which years are you talking about?
Pre- or Post-1991?
... German military ... become all powerfull over night ... In reality billions were being poured in by the British and American corporations.
Germany was the #1 economy in the world under Hitler, so OF COURSE there would be A LOT of economic trade -- especially the usual deep state suspects.
I hate to see the Slavs getting genocided, now or back then.
I also hate to see the truth about how the Germans were also genocided.
Both are terrible.
Both have been murdered at the hands of jews. It's just that the jews gaslight you about what really happened in history -- and what is happening today.
Anne Frank's stepsister explains that the Soviet photos of liberation of the camps were fake:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/138EteRjYwQD/
There is also a Fred Leutcher interview where he tells about his research into the US archives of the fake gas chamber in Dachau, which was built by the US Army under Eisenhower's order. The purpose was to have a "gas chamber" to show to American congressmen, to convince them of the fake story, as part of the psyop. I can't find the video at the moment.
The Allies realized right away that there were no gas chambers in any camps on the German side. So, they switched to the story that all the gas chambers were in the camps on the Polish side, which the USSR had control of, but never let anyone from the West in to see.
Eisenhower orderd the Army Corps of Engineers to construct a fake gas chamber at Dachau, and then invited US congressmen over to "see it for themselves."
After they left, the fake gas chamber was torn down.
Leutcher realized something was wrong when he found that the measurements he took there did not match up with the official information in the archives, so he did some digging and discovered Eisenhower's fraud.
The reality is that Hitler was a Rothchild puppet
Bullshit disinfo.
Hitler printed his own money and arrested one of the Rothschilds because he was stealing from the Austrian bank.
The whole WW2 is just a giant "fed op" to restore control over the USSR.
More bullshit disinfo.
Jews, under communism, already took over Russia and CREATED the USSR in 1917. They tried in 1905, but failed. Took another shot in 1917.
In BOTH cases, they got Russia into a war to distract and weaken. 1904 was war with Japan. 1914 was war with Germany and Austro-Hungaria. In both cases, they wanted to get Russian troops out of Moscow so they could attempt to take over.
It worked in 1917.
The jewish bankers gained a stranglehold over Germany, post-WW1.
By 1939, the jewish communists already had control of USSR for more than a decade, and they were trying to do it to Germany, too, and then the rest of Europe, and then the rest of the world.
Hitler understood that, and it was what he was fighting against.
Or do you think it is a very strange coincidence that the entire west who at the time were 100% responsible for disarming Germany, turned a blind eye to their militarization and enabled them to annex most of Western Europe?
More bullshit.
Hitler built up the German military over the objections of the West. He did not "annex most of Western Europe." That is just nonsense.
The Treaty of Versaille stole land from Germany, and he took it back. He did not advance into other European countries, until ...
-
The jews running Poland were raping, torturing, and murdering the ethnic Germans who had been under German authority, but suddenly found themselves in "Poland" as a result of the border shifting, post-WW1. He tried diplomatic means with other nations to step in and put a stop to the atrocities, but they all ignored him because they wanted a pretext for war. Eventually, he had to go in and put a stop to it himself, and sure enough, they used it as the pretext for war.
-
The Dutch and Belgians, who publicly claimed to be "neutral" in the war, were in fact discovered to be giving England a helping hand by allowing them to bring in military weapons and equipment for a surprise attack on Germany (through supposedly "neutral" countries). Hitler beat them to the punch by marching in to stop it, going all the way to Paris, to make the point.
Former German soldiers explaining to a young Dutch woman why Germany occupied her country, and what was really going on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
While he did accomplish the genocide of slavs(around 40 million of them died at Nazi hands)
The Slavs were murdered by the Soviets (jews), and the Germans were liberators.
Interview of Ukrainian soldier, talking about the Red Terror of the USSR and the liberating Germans:
Interviewer: How were you recruited to join the SS? I have always been taught the SS hated Slavs and non-Aryans, and did not want anything to do with you. Even to the point of killing millions of racially inferior Ukrainians.
Fedor: The Reds are the ones who did all the killing, not the Germans. I was sent to a camp for training as a security officer — we had Ukrainian leaders who taught us how to shoot, detain, and interrogate prisoners. Our first task was to go into Jewish areas and search for Red soldiers who were being hidden. When found they were sent to a camp, and the people aiding them were given prison terms as well.
I did this up to late 1942, and then an SS officer called all of us together and said we had the chance to form an SS fighting division, and take the fight to the Red Army. To a man, we agreed to help. We were sent for further military training, and for the first time I received a German weapon. I was used to the bad Russian rifles dating from the first war we had to use. I was given a full uniform, good pay, good food, and above all a new pair of boots.
I cannot speak for everyone, but the SS treated me very well, I had no complaints except I wish they would have used us like this earlier. Many were disgruntled, as they wanted to fight the Red Army, not bandits. I saw no evidence of the Germans, or SS, killing Ukrainians — again we saw the Germans as liberators. Something the Reds are furious at today, but they keep it very quiet trying to turn the tables.
he failed in his main objective: take over or weaken the USSR enough so that the Roth's can take back control.
Roths are jews. They and their jewish allies already had control of USSR. There was nothing to "take back."
"How Hitler saved Europe" -- detailed explanation of Stalin's war plans to invade Germany, and continue all the way to England:
An ethical doctor would have done some research and advised against it.
More likely is that the criminal drug makers had various batches with various ingredients so they could identify what happened to which guinea pigs.
When do the criminal trials begin?
You've heard of the "Big Lie," right?
The idea is that someone -- especially someone trusted, like government or media -- tells a lie that is so big that it is hard to believe it could be a lie at all, and it is repated often (think: Covid and vaccines), the human mind tends to want to believe it, even without critical thought.
Now, the interesting thing about the "Big Lie" is that the irony of it is that we are told this was something Hitler and the Germans did to their own people -- lied the Big Lie about jews, etc.
In reality, that particular narrative is actually a gaslighting of US, not the German people of the 1930's, because it was Goebbels who was talking about the Big Lie when he wrote and spoke about the English having a long history of using the Big Lie on their own people.
How's that for a mind bender?
Here is an article from Goebbels called "Churchill's Lie Factory."
As you read that article, you can clearly see that what Goebbels wrote about Churchill is exactly the same types of lies that we hear from modern politicians today.
It's a very interesting read:
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb29.htm