While you are correct, no one should think the jewish person down the street is the issue, anymore than the muslim down the street. BUt we are pattern matching animals, and ignoring patterns isn't wise.
Especially when it goes on for century's and century's, all over the world, according to various accounts - all of which say the same thing.
Again, that doesn't mean the dude down the street deserves to be attacked.
Very true, I tried a couple of times on Reddit to explain there by saying:
Consider a house party. You(royal you obv) and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did. There is no way of knowing who did what to whom.
A week later, there is a new house party. You and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is a dead dog, blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did. Who knows, but sure is weird.
A week later, there is a brand new house party a state over. You and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is a dead dog, blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did...
Repeat that another 35 times - and I don't think anyone, anywhere would say it was all the house owners that we the problem.
People just might deduce that root cause of all those problems, at all those houses, were in fact you and your buddies. If you and your buddies had enough pull and power, I bet you'd make it hard/illegal for all those house owners to speak out against you and your buds.
While you are correct, no one should think the jewish person down the street is the issue, anymore than the muslim down the street. BUt we are pattern matching animals, and ignoring patterns isn't wise.
Especially when it goes on for century's and century's, all over the world, according to various accounts - all of which say the same thing.
Again, that doesn't mean the dude down the street deserves to be attacked.
This used to be called common sense before pc culture changed people to decide with emotions instead
Very true, I tried a couple of times on Reddit to explain there by saying:
Consider a house party. You(royal you obv) and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did. There is no way of knowing who did what to whom.
A week later, there is a new house party. You and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is a dead dog, blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did. Who knows, but sure is weird.
A week later, there is a brand new house party a state over. You and your buddies go to it and a huge fight breaks out. The cops are called, there is a dead dog, blood all over the place. You say the house owners started it, they say you did...
Repeat that another 35 times - and I don't think anyone, anywhere would say it was all the house owners that we the problem.
People just might deduce that root cause of all those problems, at all those houses, were in fact you and your buddies. If you and your buddies had enough pull and power, I bet you'd make it hard/illegal for all those house owners to speak out against you and your buds.