I've checked many - generally speaking, the Wayback Machine/Archive.org does not archive things until they get enough traction to be archived.
Now... could this small account have created ongoing posts that post/delete each day until the Queen died? Or a bunch of posts for each day (deleting anything but 9/8/22)? Perhaps!
But to base this on the Wayback machine for the day it went viral is not proof of anything.
The multi-post predictions/deletions is a more plausible theory to debunk this.
Looks like someone at Twitter is pulling a stunt.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://twitter.com/aidemleoxide/status/1489686628054540290
That's not how the Wayback machine works - lol... it archives based on activity. Not each and every Tweet.
For instance: https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://twitter.com/aidemleoxide/status/1485160825803448322
Another example: https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://twitter.com/VinceCoglianese/status/1566884285969219587
I've checked many - generally speaking, the Wayback Machine/Archive.org does not archive things until they get enough traction to be archived.
Now... could this small account have created ongoing posts that post/delete each day until the Queen died? Or a bunch of posts for each day (deleting anything but 9/8/22)? Perhaps!
But to base this on the Wayback machine for the day it went viral is not proof of anything.
The multi-post predictions/deletions is a more plausible theory to debunk this.