What did Q **REPEATEDLY** say was the ‘ONLY WAY FORWARD’? I bet it’s not what you think!
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Q talked about 'military planning' a lot. And early on, in Q-post #26, Q even said ‘The only way is the military’. But he only said that once.
But NINETEEN other times, Q said that the 'only way forward' (or the ‘only way to restore trust’) was based on some combination of truth, transparency, disclosure, and (yes) accountability and prosecution. Nineteen times!
Q-post #4550 says ’Enough must see. It is the only way’.
The 'only way' is a Great Awakening.
You may not have the resources to ‘hire billboards’ or ‘fight lawsuits’ – but we can all wake people up, even if it’s one at a time.
Speak truth. Plant seeds.
Help save the world.
This is the part I don't like.
I like Kurzweil's position that there is no other intelligent life in the universe greater than our on. He bases that argument on the belief that this: This is my understanding of it and not a direct quote
Lets say we are 20 to 50 years till super AI. It would take that AI only a short time, based on the law of accelerating returns to solve problems associated with space travel to other planets. Thus if a civilization exist that is advanced to the point we will be in 50 years, we would have gotten a visit already. The thinking is sound, but there are many variables that are assumed.
I'm just thinking out loud here but what if the other planet's had such a distribution of people that made it less likely to war with each other. This would greatly impede there advancement because much of our advancement, our technology has come about through our military exploits. Or what if their civilization was not divided into many separate regions like Europe for example with competing interest. It was the competition of interest that created the great Banking empires of Europe, and without that Banking many things would not have come into existence, exspically wars. What if the nature of other life forms were less driven to compete?
I'm just postulating that their is little guarantee that two different civilizations would advance at the same level.
As for me, I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe in the Holy Bible as the inerrant words of God. And I also believe that if the planet blew up into a thousand pieces in an instant that that tragedy would be no greater than the death of a single person unless consciousness transcends time. How could it be greater or lessor. For all those living at the time would not even be aware that it happened.
I don’t have the time right now to fully reply - good thinking, and you went right for a big bite. Spirituality comes into it a lot, but there’s more to all this. If you have a chance check out the site stolenhistory.org and poke around a read a few articles. There are a lot of theories, but right away what you will find is we have more advanced technology then you may currently believe. If your time is short and only have a moment for a couple articles, or need further direction let me know and I’ll send you in a more precise path but self discovery/research and making your own conclusions are important in this process. My personal opinion is that q and the great awakening is just the tip of the ice berg and weve got crazier days to come.
Read Influx by Danial Suarez.
Physicist Jon Grady and his team have discovered a device that can reflect gravity—a triumph that will revolutionize the field of physics and change the future. But instead of acclaim, Grady’s lab is locked down by a covert organization known as the Bureau of Technology Control.
The bureau’s mission: suppress the truth of sudden technological progress and prevent the social upheaval it would trigger. Because the future is already here. And it’s rewards are only for a select few.
When Grady refuses to join the BTC, he’s thrown into a nightmarish high-tech prison housing other doomed rebel intellects. Now, as the only hope to usher humanity out of its artificial dark age, Grady and his fellow prisoners must try to expose the secrets of an unimaginable enemy—one that wields a technological advantage half a century in the making.
That seems a good book, and likely ‘channeled’ vs organically considered. From the shared description you are talking about a very common thing that occurred in the 1900’s. I don’t have a lot of time for pleasure reading, my interests are more along the lines of re-engineering the post tech. I’m planning on converting a generator to hydrogen, then a car next, once my tests are complete. I got buddies working on the batteries, but for me the water gas reaction should allow me to do a lot of industrial practices competitively.
Save me and share any research you come across that looks cool.