I tried telling my father about the twin towers and he started going off as if he knew how structures collapse. He had a tone of talking down to me saying "The fuel weakens the steal, do you know that?" I was like uhh yeah I understand how heat makes steel weaker.
He wouldn't listen to a damn word I said. He just kept repeating that the weight of the floors above would cause each level to fall down. I kept saying yeah so why didn't they fall to the side at all? Why did it look like a controlled demolition?
I want a short maybe 10 minute video by an expert explaining how this could not occur unless it was a controlled demolition.
There's also the fact that it's nearly impossible to fly an airliner into a building, especially doing it twice. If someone can't comprehend the impossibly of that along with the impossibility of he buildings collapsing from being hit by a plane then I'm not sure there's any hope for them
How do you explain the amount of people in NYC that watched the 2nd plane hit the 2nd tower? Plus videos?
A little more hard to prove but none the less.
Boeing Honeywell ‘Uninterruptible’ Autopilot System.
https://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/07/flight-control-boeings-uninterruptible-autopilot-system-drones-remote-hijacking/
“On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet.
“The aircraft was remotely flown by NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton from the NASA Dryden Remotely Controlled Vehicle Facility. Previously, the Boeing 720 had been flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots onboard. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.”
I’ve been told that they have equipped Boeings airliners with these for sometime before 9/11.
Could you use droned aircraft, that are piloted by a computer? I don't know much on the subject. I have read that AF1 travels with jets that are drones?
Correct. The official speeds and loads quoted go way out of range for these type of aircraft, imagine believing that they could carry on flying them so far over VMO that they would even stay intact, let alone be able to control them. Flying such an aircraft by an amateur would see them over controlling, it would take the slightest touch for the aircraft to respond.
To hit both towers with this size of aircraft equates to a newly passed driver, driving their car at 120 mph through their open garage doors and out the other side without touching the sides of the garage, first try! Pilots have tried to replicate the attack, especially the Pentagon and failed time and time again, and these pilots have 1000's of hours on type!
And don't get me started on the Pentagon aircraft, a descending 8000' per min 270' turn at the speeds quoted to hit level would be impossible! The aircraft would have ripped itself to pieces, many aerodynamic forces like wing flutter and roll would have seen that thing rip itself to bits. Let alone the ground effect of such an aircraft pulling itself into the ground on approach to the Pentagon!
Astonishingly, the official report stated speeds that at the heights quoted the engines couldn't output enough thrust at near sea level to obtain, they must have been taking the piss when they wrote it!