was a fully loaded passenger jet intentionally slammed into the Grenfell Tower at 600 MPH causing massive damage to multiple floors before the fire started?
Was the Grenfell Tower built using standard rigid box style riveted girder construction?
...or was it constructed with a "radical design" of a cantilevered open floor concept that bridged the central core to the outer skin facade using horizontal zig zag trusses which held metal pans to hold concrete with pretensioned wires inside?
don't you think it's fair to admit that you can design a building to withstand a fire, and you can design it to withstand an impact... but good luck designing it to survive an impact that destructive and a fire that burned that long at the same time.
You're just not being realistic/honest at all in your comparison and you're either doing it on purpose or it was done to you on purpose.
barely-below-the-surface investigation makes your assertions sound silly.
The Twin Towers were designed to easily withstand multiple airline impacts. An aluminum can smashing into the most advanced building of its time would not have done shit to the structural integrity. Collaborate with your low iq shills here and try again....
The Twin Towers were designed to easily withstand multiple airline impacts
Wow it's amazing how ridiculous this hollow rebutal has gotten over time... first it was just "a plane" then it became "the same exact plane that hit it" now it's "multiple planes"
It's just fascinating.
They were designed to survive the impact of a smaller plane moving at a much slower speed, light on fuel. This is "a thing" because of the bomber which was low on fuel and lost in a fog looking to land at LaGuardia which then crashed into the side of the empire state building.
July 28, 1945
A United States military plane crashes into the Empire State Building on July 28, 1945, killing 14 people. The freak accident was caused by heavy fog. The B-25 Mitchell bomber, with two pilots and one passenger aboard, was flying from New Bedford, Massachusetts, to LaGuardia Airport in New York City.
holy shit the hyperbole is strong with you, you have a real bad habit of making ridiculous hot takes even worse by exaggerating them. you should work on that.
planes aren't beer cans
an empty12 oz beer can weighs 0.033 pounds
all up weight on a Boeing 757 is 255000 Lb, a Boeing 767 weighs more
which do you think has more mass?
which do you think is going to do more damage at 600 MPH?
did you not see the video of the impacts?
are you actually claiming that the impacts/explosions/shit flying out the other side was faked?
before you answer that... please remember that half of new york and new jersey was in person standing in the streets or looking out their windows watching the fire of the first tower burn when the second plane hit...
are you seriously suggesting that the thousands and thousand of eyewitnesses who watched a plane fly into the second tower... the videos these people took... all fake?
the most advanced building of its time
no it wasn't, it was considered "radical" because it was a cantilevered floor design and MANY architects warned that it was unsafe for this exact reason... (susceptible to collapse due to damage combined with sustained fire)
would not have done shit to the structural integrity.
you can see the giant holes in the side of the building, the holes alone are literally damaging the structural integrity because part of the design was to pin the floors to the outer perimeter walls.
the zig zag trusses and pretensioned concrete floors pinned the structure together, when the floors sagged and failed there was nothing left holding the walls to the central core... allowing bowing.
without floors you have no stability control over torsion forces on the exterior.
Collaborate with your low iq shills here and try again....
i've been dragging my whoile dick and balls over the faces of the truthtards all day, i'm good, i'm gonna celebrate with a fat joint and a double shot of Elijah Craig
was a fully loaded passenger jet intentionally slammed into the Grenfell Tower at 600 MPH causing massive damage to multiple floors before the fire started?
Was the Grenfell Tower built using standard rigid box style riveted girder construction?
...or was it constructed with a "radical design" of a cantilevered open floor concept that bridged the central core to the outer skin facade using horizontal zig zag trusses which held metal pans to hold concrete with pretensioned wires inside?
don't you think it's fair to admit that you can design a building to withstand a fire, and you can design it to withstand an impact... but good luck designing it to survive an impact that destructive and a fire that burned that long at the same time.
You're just not being realistic/honest at all in your comparison and you're either doing it on purpose or it was done to you on purpose.
barely-below-the-surface investigation makes your assertions sound silly.
The Twin Towers were designed to easily withstand multiple airline impacts. An aluminum can smashing into the most advanced building of its time would not have done shit to the structural integrity. Collaborate with your low iq shills here and try again....
Wow it's amazing how ridiculous this hollow rebutal has gotten over time... first it was just "a plane" then it became "the same exact plane that hit it" now it's "multiple planes"
It's just fascinating.
They were designed to survive the impact of a smaller plane moving at a much slower speed, light on fuel. This is "a thing" because of the bomber which was low on fuel and lost in a fog looking to land at LaGuardia which then crashed into the side of the empire state building.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/plane-crashes-into-empire-state-building#:~:text=A%20United%20States%20military%20plane%20crashes%20into%20the,Massachusetts%2C%20to%20LaGuardia%20Airport%20in%20New%20York%20City.
holy shit the hyperbole is strong with you, you have a real bad habit of making ridiculous hot takes even worse by exaggerating them. you should work on that.
planes aren't beer cans an empty12 oz beer can weighs 0.033 pounds all up weight on a Boeing 757 is 255000 Lb, a Boeing 767 weighs more
which do you think has more mass?
which do you think is going to do more damage at 600 MPH?
did you not see the video of the impacts?
are you actually claiming that the impacts/explosions/shit flying out the other side was faked?
before you answer that... please remember that half of new york and new jersey was in person standing in the streets or looking out their windows watching the fire of the first tower burn when the second plane hit...
are you seriously suggesting that the thousands and thousand of eyewitnesses who watched a plane fly into the second tower... the videos these people took... all fake?
no it wasn't, it was considered "radical" because it was a cantilevered floor design and MANY architects warned that it was unsafe for this exact reason... (susceptible to collapse due to damage combined with sustained fire)
you can see the giant holes in the side of the building, the holes alone are literally damaging the structural integrity because part of the design was to pin the floors to the outer perimeter walls.
the zig zag trusses and pretensioned concrete floors pinned the structure together, when the floors sagged and failed there was nothing left holding the walls to the central core... allowing bowing.
without floors you have no stability control over torsion forces on the exterior.
most ironic L of the day.
Take a break and light off some firecrackers 'explosive expert'....you guys are not having a good night....
i've been dragging my whoile dick and balls over the faces of the truthtards all day, i'm good, i'm gonna celebrate with a fat joint and a double shot of Elijah Craig