The top of the building would have toppled over ,it wouldn't have imploded into its own footprint.
While your at it explain bldg 7 and no airplane wreckage at the pentagon
The top of the building would have toppled over ,it wouldn't have imploded into its own footprint.
buildings aren't trees, they don't "topple over" like that when this type of damage and failure occurs. it's actually quite complicated to get a building to fall over to the side, it requires months of careful planning and strategic charges placed in all the right places going off in a pattern to allow the building to fall the way you want it to.
some do begin to fall that way, but once it starts to lean everything just explodes from the tension and unless it has something to pivot on or there are precisely timed charges to sever foundational links where the tension would be... it drops straight down (cause gravity).
in fact, if you watch the collapse, you can see the antenna on top of the tower leaning to the side before it does exactly what i just described... starts to lean then accelerates downward.
While your at it explain bldg 7
same exact "damage + fires = collapse" that caused the first two to drop.
WTC7 had massive damage done to it by the collapse of the other two, there were also multiple fires that started all over that area when it got damaged. those fires heated up the damaged area until the damaged area was no longer able to carry the weight of the building above.
no airplane wreckage at the pentagon
out of all the things you said this is the most embarrassing one and the one you should probably stop saying the most. there are plenty of pictures showing wreckage, even part of an engine and landing gear...
shortly after the attack someone posted a whole slew of pictures they took from the road, on the other side of the fence, that had obstructed views due to the grass berm they were behind.
a bunch of disinfo assholes started saying "oh look there's no plane parts" and people ran with it.
you can just google img search "pentagon plane wreckage" and you'll see how debunked this particular one is.
...perhaps ask yourself how exactly did you come to believe this without ever checking into it yourself and how that might also be true about other things you believe.
wow, you're probably the biggest faggot in this thread
Thousands of engineers and architect's disagree.
a fringe minority of dumb people with a dumb opinion.
No fireproof steel building in the world ever collapsed into its own footprint until 9 11 when 3 did
they weren't "fireproof" (god damn you are stupid for saying that, lol) 1 + 2 were radical open floor plan design, and no building on the planet has been intentionally rammed at 600mph by a fully fueled passenger jet.
There wasn't any airplane wreckage at the Pentagon and YOU don't have any pictures 9f it
wrong faggot, here's literally first three things that come up in an image search for "pentagon plane crash":
Hundreds of NYC Firefighters heard the explosives going off
first off prove that (you literally can't you're just making up "hundreds" cause you're a faggot), secondly yeah lots of loud noises happen during building collapses
faggot.
why would i keep calling you a faggot you might be wondering? well, only a glowfag faggot would say all this easily debunked bullshit and then follow it up with a faggoty line like this:
Have a nice day Rabbi
= faggot
you're the reason people come here and call us "antisemites", people like you either don't belong here at all (cause you're such a massive faggot) or you're a plant doing this stupid faggot shit on purpose to make everyone here look bad.
The top of the building would have toppled over ,it wouldn't have imploded into its own footprint. While your at it explain bldg 7 and no airplane wreckage at the pentagon
yikes
buildings aren't trees, they don't "topple over" like that when this type of damage and failure occurs. it's actually quite complicated to get a building to fall over to the side, it requires months of careful planning and strategic charges placed in all the right places going off in a pattern to allow the building to fall the way you want it to.
some do begin to fall that way, but once it starts to lean everything just explodes from the tension and unless it has something to pivot on or there are precisely timed charges to sever foundational links where the tension would be... it drops straight down (cause gravity).
in fact, if you watch the collapse, you can see the antenna on top of the tower leaning to the side before it does exactly what i just described... starts to lean then accelerates downward.
same exact "damage + fires = collapse" that caused the first two to drop.
WTC7 had massive damage done to it by the collapse of the other two, there were also multiple fires that started all over that area when it got damaged. those fires heated up the damaged area until the damaged area was no longer able to carry the weight of the building above.
out of all the things you said this is the most embarrassing one and the one you should probably stop saying the most. there are plenty of pictures showing wreckage, even part of an engine and landing gear...
shortly after the attack someone posted a whole slew of pictures they took from the road, on the other side of the fence, that had obstructed views due to the grass berm they were behind.
a bunch of disinfo assholes started saying "oh look there's no plane parts" and people ran with it.
you can just google img search "pentagon plane wreckage" and you'll see how debunked this particular one is.
...perhaps ask yourself how exactly did you come to believe this without ever checking into it yourself and how that might also be true about other things you believe.
Thousands of engineers and architect's disagree.
No fireproof steel building in the world ever collapsed into its own footprint until 9 11 when 3 did
There wasn't any airplane wreckage at the Pentagon and YOU don't have any pictures 9f it
Hundreds of NYC Firefighters heard the explosives going off
The truth is coming out and you're in a panic, ts so much fun to watch. Have a nice day Rabbi
wow, you're probably the biggest faggot in this thread
a fringe minority of dumb people with a dumb opinion.
they weren't "fireproof" (god damn you are stupid for saying that, lol) 1 + 2 were radical open floor plan design, and no building on the planet has been intentionally rammed at 600mph by a fully fueled passenger jet.
wrong faggot, here's literally first three things that come up in an image search for "pentagon plane crash":
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/F321/production/_95414226_9-11pentagondebris.jpg https://drop.ndtv.com/albums/NEWS/pentagon_photos/2.jpg https://images05.military.com/sites/default/files/styles/full/public/2021-09/pentagon-911-1200-1.jpg?itok=59V_9kAk
first off prove that (you literally can't you're just making up "hundreds" cause you're a faggot), secondly yeah lots of loud noises happen during building collapses
faggot.
why would i keep calling you a faggot you might be wondering? well, only a glowfag faggot would say all this easily debunked bullshit and then follow it up with a faggoty line like this:
= faggot
you're the reason people come here and call us "antisemites", people like you either don't belong here at all (cause you're such a massive faggot) or you're a plant doing this stupid faggot shit on purpose to make everyone here look bad.
either way die in a fire faggot.
911 Truther LOL. Good one rabbi
u/#q916
Try harder rabbi Saving Isreal for last