So You telling me that this(A plane's nosecone that was hit by a bird) cut straight through a steel exoskeleton and reinforced concrete...AND came out the other side virtually intact...Yeah OK...😏😏
(media.greatawakening.win)
*** SEE TOP COMMENT ***
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (83)
sorted by:
Let me say again, and again and again and again. All buildings that are brought down in controlled demolitions are significantly weakened. Remember the Israeli art team running around the towers in the months before 9/11? Remember the numerous reports of dust and loud sounds of construction on closed floors?
Exactly...This notion that Planes were solely to blame for the Towers collapse is complete BS....There is so much info/facts out there and people still believe its the fucking "hijacked planes" ....just like at the Pentagon...The Destruction caused by the 'plane's impact' would have meant the plane would have had to be almost Ground level....Some fucking piloting skills there for a Part-time pilot wouldn't you say?...
This. There's NO way the buildings were brought down with the impacts. The Architects of the buildings even said so themselves on video, stating that they had specifically designed the buildings to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 707, which was at the time the largest aircraft in the air. Absolutely not, you are correct. There is absolutely no way to explain, for instance, all the molten steel that was coming up out of the ground for weeks and weeks and even months afterwards.
This. The thermite was necessary to weaken the outer structure. The steel beam mesh on the outside of the building was 40% of the load. The squibs were from the termite and cutters. The nuclear plutonium charges were magnetically focused inwards on the core (which is where the molten steel came from). Look up the BB18 image