To cite one final example of the range of responsibilities that will fall upon you: you may hold a position of command with our special forces, forces which are too unconventional to be called conventional, forces which are growing in number and importance and significance, for we now know that it is wholly misleading to call this "the nuclear age," or to say that our security rests only on the doctrine of massive retaliation.
Korea has not been the only battleground since the end of the Second World War. Men have fought and died in Malaya, in Greece, in the Philippines, in Algeria and Cuba and Cyprus, and almost continuously on the Indo-Chinese Peninsula. No nuclear weapons have been fired. No massive nuclear retaliation has been considered appropriate.
This is another type of war, new in its intensity, ancient in its origin -- war by guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins, war by ambush instead of by combat; by infiltration, instead of aggression, seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him. It is a form of warfare uniquely adapted to what has been strangely called "wars of liberation," to undermine the efforts of new and poor countries to maintain the freedom that they have finally achieved. It preys on economic unrest and ethnic conflicts. It requires in those situations where we must counter it, and these are the kinds of challenges that will be before us in the next decade if freedom is to be saved, a whole new kind of strategy, a wholly different kind of force, and therefore a new and wholly different kind of military training.
Highlighting a couple of phrases:
This is another type of war, new in its intensity, ancient in its origin -- war by guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins, war by ambush instead of by combat; by infiltration, instead of aggression, seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him.
to undermine the efforts of new and poor countries to maintain the freedom that they have finally achieved.
I don't understand why I am receiving dislikes on my question of: What is the Ancient Enemy?
The 'Secret Society Speech' does not address 'An Ancient Enemy'. It addresses censorship and the media's "obligation to inform and alert the American people, to make certain they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them well..."
And this statement: "But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all."
And;
"In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security."
https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkwestpointcommencementspeech.htm
Highlighting a couple of phrases:
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
Don't forget, we are a new country.
What was he suggesting was the Ancient Enemy?
See JFK's Secret Societies Speech.
I don't understand why I am receiving dislikes on my question of: What is the Ancient Enemy?
The 'Secret Society Speech' does not address 'An Ancient Enemy'. It addresses censorship and the media's "obligation to inform and alert the American people, to make certain they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them well..."
And this statement: "But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all."
And;
"In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security."
So, what am I missing frens?
Can you not just say what it is if you know it? Gosh.
Q proof.