After all, the Sacred Scriptures spent a thousand years in the hands of the Vatican (half of that if you count the Eastern Orthodox churches) . How do we know that the cabal didn't alter, add or supress anything important on them in all those years, that's also not counting the other supposedly reformed editions that were made by people with ties to Freemasonry and the City of London ?
I might also be in dire need of some time out of the news and the digging. Feel free to call me out if that's the case.
I use GNV - Geneva 1599
Because it's one the Founding Fathers would have been familiar with, seeing how the Anglican-hating Protestant Pilgrims came here and it doesn't have all of Francis Bacon's bullshit in it like the original KJV from 1611.
https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/1599-Geneva-Bible-GNV/
Same, I use this one. The fact it mentions unicorns makes it even better. I usually cross reference new translations with Geneva to see differences. Sometimes the are much different. Geneva is always better.
I do too, the Geneva Bible has such an interesting history. have found this site helpful;https://www.apuritansmind.com/arminianism/the-“god”-of-arminianism-is-not-worshippable/