Honestly, the only reason they need to "seize" a phone is for submission for evidence. Trust me... they can hack in any phone at any time; constant reminder from the Jan 6 deal (don't get me started). Anyway, what evidence would they want on his phone to hurt us? Pretty limited. "How does one introduce evidence legally" ... not an exact quote. But you get the point. I see this as a "turn in the tide." I hate using LOTR references, but this one fits. I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if this goes backwards, but wait 72 hours for processing; then let me have it.
Honestly, the only reason they need to "seize" a phone is for submission for evidence. Trust me... they can hack in any phone at any time; constant reminder from the Jan 6 deal (don't get me started). Anyway, what evidence would they want on his phone to hurt us? Pretty limited. "How does one introduce evidence legally" ... not an exact quote. But you get the point. I see this as a "turn in the tide." I hate using LOTR references, but this one fits. I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if this goes backwards, but wait 72 hours for processing; then let me have it.