⇒ According to the latest statistics, life expectancy in the United States dropped precipitously in 2020 and 2021. In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was nearly 79 years. By the end of 2021, life expectancy had dropped to 76 — a loss of nearly three years
⇒ Even small declines in life expectancy of a tenth or two-tenths of a year mean that on a population level, a lot more people are dying prematurely than they really should be
What Has Caused Drop in Life Expectancy?
Lethal Traffic Accidents Are at 20-Year High
'Sudden Death Syndrome' May Be Driving Down Life Expectancy
Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead at Record Numbers
Excess Death Trend in the US
Working Age Adults Dying in Record Numbers
Excess Death Trends in England and Wales
“If this trajectory continues, the number of non-COVID excess deaths in the U.K. will outpace COVID deaths in 2022”.
Excess Deaths Should Be BELOW Average in 2022
People who under normal circumstances would have died in 2022 from old age and natural causes, already died from COVID, either in 2020 or 2021.
People who should have decades of life expectancy left are the ones dying. As just one example, "an unprecedented series of sudden deaths among healthy children and adolescents" is being reported in Greece, and "forensic experts are unable to provide any clear explanation for this." Between January 2020 and June 2022, unexplained deaths among children under the age of 19 rose from 70 to 138.
What's Killing Younger Healthy People?
As if we didn't already know.
I'm not a fan of anything on that website. This is not an argument against their information. I have no idea if their information is well sourced or meaningful because I can't access it. It requires a subscription just to see it. It deletes its articles after two days, and it is prevented from being archived.
Such control of information smacks of psyop to me.
Mercola is an osteopathic doctor. That makes him enemy number one to BIg Pharma. In my area where I live, osteopaths, naturopaths, and homeopaths are targeted and prosecuted on the most whimsical of charges. With Big Pharma and the Medical industry here, I wonder why? I think we know. The medical mafia (FDA, AMA, etc.) has tried to shut Mercola down in the past, so I believe the reason why the subscription and the deleting of articles may be due to this fact. If one thinks about it, deleting articles after "two days", might be an effective legal defense strategy. It's never a good idea to leave a long trail of crumbs, no? I know for a fact, the medical mafia has targeted Mercola.
I am on his mailing list now, but I signed up years ago only to find his emails were repeatedly going into my trash bin after my repeated attempts to correct this. I then experienced no subscription emails from Mercola to which I had to subscribe all over again. This happened a total of 3 times. WTH.
I scan over Mercola's emails from time to time. This posting happens to be the first one I believe I posted coming from a Mercola article. IMHO, Dr. Mercola does source his information consistently. The posting I made here is without including those sources.
In the end, trust your own instincts though.
I appreciate he may be afraid and that that fear may be a motive for his actions, however, being afraid is no excuse to delete information.
We live in The Matrix. While there is certainly false information around, The Matrix isn't created so much by false information, as by hidden information. I.e. it's the stuff that is memory holed that really creates our false views of the world. In addition, us being trained to trust reporting sources instead of looking for ourselves at primary sources is how the system perpetuates itself.
In other words, the whole reason we are in the place we are in is because information has been hidden, and primary sources are not sought out over an "expert" analysis of them. The credentials of the speaker is more important than the actual evidence of the argument.
While I don't think you have meant to, your posts show exactly what I mean. Instead of being able to see primary sources of data, on a data driven argument, I have received Mercola's credentials as argument as to why Mercola words (which I can't even read) are worth listening to. He is an "against the Cabal" "expert," thus his words have credence.
I just want to see the data that supports the claim, but I can't even see if the claims have data support unless I sign up, and that will never happen. This is exactly how "controlled opposition" operates. That doesn't mean Mercola is such, but it is a method that is employed for that purpose; to control "the other side."
How do you connect being wise and guarded to being "afraid?" I really don't understand the correlation. I don't believe your inconvenience of a 2-day reading limit and subscription is Dr. Mercola's problem.
Here are the sources to the article I posted. You might want to reconsidering your joining.
1, 2 New York Times August 31, 2022 (Archived) 3 NHTSA August 17, 2022
4 Our World in Data Excess Mortality During COVID Pandemic 5 Scottish Parliament Inquiry Into Excess Deaths
6 The Telegraph August 24, 2022
7 The Guardian August 24, 2022
8 Good Sciencing Athlete Deaths
9 European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation December 2006; 13(6): 859-875
10 Circulation February 16, 2009; 119: 1085-1092
11 European Journal of Preventive Cardiology June 16, 2022; zwac080
12 Science Daily June 16, 2022
13 medRxiv May 17, 2022 14 The Center Square January 1, 2022
15 Robert Malone Substack January 2, 2022
16 Gov.UK Excess Mortality in England and English Regions
17, 18 The Telegraph August 18, 2022
19 ons.gov.uk Provisional Deaths August 23, 2022
20 Parliamentary Question e-00219/2022
21 Our World in Data COVID Vaccinations
22, 24 Steve.kirsch.substack January 3, 2022
23 Roundingtheearth.substack January 3, 2022
You can call it guarded if you want. Guarded can be seen as a reaction to fear. If you take issue with the word "afraid" that's on you. They can easily have the same meaning. They can easily have separate meanings. The nuance is in the desires of the speaker or the listener. Such issues with verbiage to dismiss my argument do not help advance the topic.
I am speaking in general. Hiding information is the key to The Matrix. I don't care about Mercola when I say that, I care about the perpetuation of The Matrix, or rather, that people see how it is perpetuated so that people can learn to overcome it. So that people can learn a different way.
I appreciate you supplying sources. I will take a look at them. If Mercola ever starts supplying these things himself to all audiences without restriction or attempts to later hide the information (for which I can see no honest motivation), then I will listen to what he has to say.
Let me make clear; I'm not, not listening to Mercola because I don't want to. I'm not listening because he is purposefully not speaking to me. This "exclusionary" principle is one of the tools used by Controlled Opposition agents. It is a tactic used to give information more import. It's "a secret," and only available to "the initiate," therefore it has more credence.
Again, I'm not saying that is why Mercola is adopting this tactic. I am only pointing out that it is a common tactic for such agents.