I made no assumptions. I asked about precession and has nothing to do with rotating bodies in space. Precession is a specific arc degree deviation from the circumferential rotation on an axial, tilted, plane. Its been used with alignments to celestial bodies for 1000s of years with reverse location hemispherically on earth by time. Additionally allows triangulation after the location/time value is known. There is no way to align a structure or any object to North and magnetic north by longitude and latitude without this input as a known value.
The use of the inverse square law as your example is also innacurate method of measurement because it is not a measurement, it's a calculation and it excludes the , medium, that light travels through.
I can appreciate the long reply, however the rest of your response simply posits questions that are loaded and leading and do not address anything involving precession which was, again, what I asked a flat earther to explain, describe etc. As expected the responses have all been deflection and or it doesn't exist and is a lie.
Btw scientific does not apply to measurements. Scientific is a method. Measurement is a action in Units. It does not apply to a type of measurement. As an example, the inverse square law is not a scientific measurement, it is a formula/equation to calculate the desired factors input into the variables along with the constants to equate a value. It also does not calculate "visibility"
Precession has nothing to do with rotating bodies"
Well if this is so, you should sign up to edit Wikipedia's page on precession as the people who manage that page have no idea what they're talking about apparently.
"Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself. In other words, if the axis of rotation of a body is itself rotating about a second axis, that body is said to be precessing about the second axis. A motion in which the second Euler angle changes is called nutation. In physics, there are two types of precession: torque-free and torque-induced.
In astronomy, precession refers to any of several slow changes in an astronomical body's rotational or orbital {sic - which implies rotating planets/stars} parameters. An important example is the steady change in the orientation of the axis of rotation of the Earth, known as the precession of the equinoxes."
I'm telling you what you see in the sky, and what you CLEARLY SAW in the sky before you entered into our government indoctrination and brainwashing camps (school) is PRECISELY what is up in the sky ---->>>> LIGHTS not "Bodies".
I'm suggesting that there are no kajillion ton rocks magically floating in the sky. Gravity is an unproven theory and always will be as it does not exist. You cannot bend/warp No-thing-ness, aka "The fabric of space-time" --- "Space" and "Time" are not "things" and therefore there is nothing to bend/warp in the first place. Dark matter & dark energy were made up to explain away the mathematical inconsistencies astronomers were beginning to calculate in the middle of the 20th century.
There is no proof of floating rocks. There is no proof of rotating rocks. There is no proof of gravity. There is no proof of special relativity. There is no proof of quantum mechanics. There is no proof of quantum superposition. There is no proof of atoms. There is no proof of electrons/neutrons/protons. There is no proof of photons. There is no proof that light has a "speed". All of this is hypothesis, speculation and theory brought to you by a cabal who doesn't want you to understand who you are, where you are and why you are here.
I've come to the realization that there are people who do want to contemplate and investigate these things and those who don't. And there's no in between. And the latter group greatly outnumbers the former. That's where we're at and that's the way it is.
No hard feelings. I understand I'm in a very small minority at this stage. It's been that way my whole life. For whatever reason I see through BS like nobody else I know. That's how I'm wired.
I made no assumptions. I asked about precession and has nothing to do with rotating bodies in space. Precession is a specific arc degree deviation from the circumferential rotation on an axial, tilted, plane. Its been used with alignments to celestial bodies for 1000s of years with reverse location hemispherically on earth by time. Additionally allows triangulation after the location/time value is known. There is no way to align a structure or any object to North and magnetic north by longitude and latitude without this input as a known value. The use of the inverse square law as your example is also innacurate method of measurement because it is not a measurement, it's a calculation and it excludes the , medium, that light travels through.
I can appreciate the long reply, however the rest of your response simply posits questions that are loaded and leading and do not address anything involving precession which was, again, what I asked a flat earther to explain, describe etc. As expected the responses have all been deflection and or it doesn't exist and is a lie.
Btw scientific does not apply to measurements. Scientific is a method. Measurement is a action in Units. It does not apply to a type of measurement. As an example, the inverse square law is not a scientific measurement, it is a formula/equation to calculate the desired factors input into the variables along with the constants to equate a value. It also does not calculate "visibility"
Well if this is so, you should sign up to edit Wikipedia's page on precession as the people who manage that page have no idea what they're talking about apparently.
"Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself. In other words, if the axis of rotation of a body is itself rotating about a second axis, that body is said to be precessing about the second axis. A motion in which the second Euler angle changes is called nutation. In physics, there are two types of precession: torque-free and torque-induced.
In astronomy, precession refers to any of several slow changes in an astronomical body's rotational or orbital {sic - which implies rotating planets/stars} parameters. An important example is the steady change in the orientation of the axis of rotation of the Earth, known as the precession of the equinoxes."
I'm telling you what you see in the sky, and what you CLEARLY SAW in the sky before you entered into our government indoctrination and brainwashing camps (school) is PRECISELY what is up in the sky ---->>>> LIGHTS not "Bodies".
I'm suggesting that there are no kajillion ton rocks magically floating in the sky. Gravity is an unproven theory and always will be as it does not exist. You cannot bend/warp No-thing-ness, aka "The fabric of space-time" --- "Space" and "Time" are not "things" and therefore there is nothing to bend/warp in the first place. Dark matter & dark energy were made up to explain away the mathematical inconsistencies astronomers were beginning to calculate in the middle of the 20th century.
There is no proof of floating rocks. There is no proof of rotating rocks. There is no proof of gravity. There is no proof of special relativity. There is no proof of quantum mechanics. There is no proof of quantum superposition. There is no proof of atoms. There is no proof of electrons/neutrons/protons. There is no proof of photons. There is no proof that light has a "speed". All of this is hypothesis, speculation and theory brought to you by a cabal who doesn't want you to understand who you are, where you are and why you are here.
I've come to the realization that there are people who do want to contemplate and investigate these things and those who don't. And there's no in between. And the latter group greatly outnumbers the former. That's where we're at and that's the way it is.
No hard feelings. I understand I'm in a very small minority at this stage. It's been that way my whole life. For whatever reason I see through BS like nobody else I know. That's how I'm wired.
The dude you replied to is probably an AI bot, try and see if you can fish for its IP address
You could be right. Would explain the disconnected ramblings but written in a way to have some plausible Intellect associated content as well.
Yeah that's imo the easiest tell, also they tend to be deployed en masse on subjects that are heavily shilled or popularly used to slide forums