Let's put it this way because you made the same point on my thread. Calling political profit is stretching at best. There is very clear definition of human trafficking (legally speaking). "Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act" as per DHS. Tell me out of that description what qualifies this as Human Trafficking.
No. Human trafficking has multiple components, either coercion or forcefully and for proffit. These people went willingly and the expense of the tax payer. The only ones turning a proffit are the bus drivers and owners
No, but it is a ploy by rinos to curry favor with a base too stupid to understand that real principles and values mean having correlated actions.
Spreading them around to suburbs around the country hurts the country, it doesn’t matter if it pisses off your political opponent.
It’s exactly like the 15 weeks abortion ban.
It does nothing but hurt but it’s spun in a way that those that don’t know better think it’s a good thing.
It's a move. Now you have illegal immigrants at the hands of the federal government right after Kamala said the border is secure. Ok, well what are they going to do? Sweep it under the rug? Lol. It's about exposing the problem to people that refuse to pay attention.
The democrat base want illegals.
The republican base already knows democrats are corrupt.
Who are they exposing it to? Do you see anyone upset that Lori lightfoot sent all those illegals to the Chicago suburbs? I haven’t seen any evidence that this has done anything other than spreading illegals to parts of the country that didn’t have them before.
The democrat base is uninformed and have no clue we have a 4.9 million with almost 900k getaways that crossed since Biden took office. Spreading a 100 illegal immigrants to sanctuary jurisdiction hardly solves the problem, but it definitely makes noise. Maybe a few more libs will wake up.
It is my understanding that immigrants are offered free transportation to "sanctuary cities". They are able to board the bus/plane going to a city of their choice after their catch/release.
No you are not thinking correctly. These people came of their own free will, illegally. They boarded the buses willingly and are let go as free people.
This is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of children or youths being held AGAINST THEIR WILL in cages and having their blood drained to provide Adrenochrome to wealthy buyers or as sex slaves or sacrifices to the Satanic occultists and depraved people.
No. Human trafficking is taking people against their will and holding them captive for nefarious reasons.
This is just the opposite.
Are the people doing it profiting?
Is political capital not profit.
I made this post to help myself understand.
Let's put it this way because you made the same point on my thread. Calling political profit is stretching at best. There is very clear definition of human trafficking (legally speaking). "Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act" as per DHS. Tell me out of that description what qualifies this as Human Trafficking.
I see your point, and agree.
I also kek at them going to kamala's.
What a time to be alive.
When you have a better idea, get back to us.
No. Human trafficking has multiple components, either coercion or forcefully and for proffit. These people went willingly and the expense of the tax payer. The only ones turning a proffit are the bus drivers and owners
For political capital as profit
Ignores points about coercion or forcefully.
No, but it is a ploy by rinos to curry favor with a base too stupid to understand that real principles and values mean having correlated actions. Spreading them around to suburbs around the country hurts the country, it doesn’t matter if it pisses off your political opponent. It’s exactly like the 15 weeks abortion ban. It does nothing but hurt but it’s spun in a way that those that don’t know better think it’s a good thing.
It's a move. Now you have illegal immigrants at the hands of the federal government right after Kamala said the border is secure. Ok, well what are they going to do? Sweep it under the rug? Lol. It's about exposing the problem to people that refuse to pay attention.
The democrat base want illegals. The republican base already knows democrats are corrupt. Who are they exposing it to? Do you see anyone upset that Lori lightfoot sent all those illegals to the Chicago suburbs? I haven’t seen any evidence that this has done anything other than spreading illegals to parts of the country that didn’t have them before.
The democrat base is uninformed and have no clue we have a 4.9 million with almost 900k getaways that crossed since Biden took office. Spreading a 100 illegal immigrants to sanctuary jurisdiction hardly solves the problem, but it definitely makes noise. Maybe a few more libs will wake up.
It is my understanding that immigrants are offered free transportation to "sanctuary cities". They are able to board the bus/plane going to a city of their choice after their catch/release.
I see thank you.
I don't agree with it either, even if they were free to do so. Also don't think its really happening. Confirmation bias goes both ways.
No you are not thinking correctly. These people came of their own free will, illegally. They boarded the buses willingly and are let go as free people.
This is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of children or youths being held AGAINST THEIR WILL in cages and having their blood drained to provide Adrenochrome to wealthy buyers or as sex slaves or sacrifices to the Satanic occultists and depraved people.
How can you confuse the two?