Would a world government be bad if they were just restricted to enforcing a US style constitution?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Obviously the thought of world governance brings up ideas of tyrants restricting liberties via socialism and communism. What if instead of these systems, a cooperative world government was in place whose only agreed upon role would be to strictly enforce a well written constitution, such as something like the US Constitution?
To me, the main problems would be voter fraud, a federal reserve type monetary system, big tech monopolies and also a sense of complacency amongst communities.
If by some magic (perhaps blockchain technologies) these problems could be fixed, I don't see how a world government, or a world constitution would be a bad thing.
I would love to know others thoughts about this
Personally speaking in my opinion at any rate. A World Government of one form or another is likely an inevitability. Granted I’m talking Centuries if not millennia down the line with the perquisite of continuing interconnectivity, intermingling and cultural exchanges brought on by further technological developments and increasing efficiency of vehicles and means of transport. Hell humanity may wipe ourselves out before then. But I digress.
Trying to force it through in modern day. Such a Government by its very nature will need to be brutal and authoritarian with a Security apparatus that would make Soviet Russia, and the CCP jealous. Too many cultural and political differences at the moment to mean such a Government would have the ability come to power peacefully or by popular consensus.
What form any proposed World Government would take I can’t rightly say. What I can say though. At this stage in the Game. A World Government is the absolutely last thing the world needs at this point in time.