Frens,
I love you. I really do. But there’s no need for paragraph-long headlines. Sum up your post title in just a few words. Sort of exhausting. Plus it defeats the purpose of a title and subsequent text of post.
Thanks.
Frens,
I love you. I really do. But there’s no need for paragraph-long headlines. Sum up your post title in just a few words. Sort of exhausting. Plus it defeats the purpose of a title and subsequent text of post.
Thanks.
Hate 3 word, make me click crap. 100pct Give me tldr to decide on digging in
If you are doing an image post, title is all you have to explain it and you aren't even supposed to add the link there. So, we work within our limitations. Titles that are so short as to be non-descriptive are a bigger issue because they hinder searching later and are just annoying.
Things are cooking and this is the best you can come up with
Agreed. The most extreme version of this being a paragraph as a title and then just a dot "." or "see title" where the text is supposed to be.
No
Wahhhhhh
Giving enough to get the point across is good no matter the link. The WOWs and BOOMs with no explanation at all are short, but also plain useless not to mention annoying as hell.
Jesus wept
It's 297 chars.. it's not bad.. 2 lines.
u/#trumpnope
I like longer headlines,then I don't need to read the artical.