No, we should be rejecting lunacy that defies proven facts. The "Deep State" hasn't existed as a continuous entity for centuries, capable of subverting all knowledge. If that were true, scientific and technological progress would not be possible, because they rely on the existence of reality and would not work based on falsehood.
The inability to recognize reality is insanity. And the inability (or unwillingness) to defend the recognition of reality is capitulation to insanity---otherwise known as evil. Pick a side---but don't pick lunacy.
No, we should be rejecting lunacy that defies proven facts. The "Deep State" hasn't existed as a continuous entity for centuries, capable of subverting all knowledge. If that were true, scientific and technological progress would not be possible, because they rely on the existence of reality and would not work based on falsehood.
The inability to recognize reality is insanity. And the inability (or unwillingness) to defend the recognition of reality is capitulation to insanity---otherwise known as evil. Pick a side---but don't pick lunacy.