Totalitarian government goons are the problem irrespective of what the individual labels themselves. Terrible people will do despicable things for power and identify as whatever is necessary to get that power. The left is obsessed with labels and identity. Some will never get it or don't care. I just want them to leave me alone as they call me a white supremacist conservative.
Amer-Inds are very connected to Nature and to Nature's God. The Laws of Nature are the basis for Adamic Law that proceeds Thomas Aquinas foundational writings on Natural Law and Common Law. If it is taken from perspective and how our Constitution incorporated all of this, inroads to understanding could occur. The Marxist appeal to many Amer-Inds has to do with denying property rights. But, even these Amer-Inds believe in property rights otherwise they wouldn't being claiming their rights to the land. Marxism is property rights as long as the ruling class owns it and it is denied to the people. From this perspective, there can be understanding in what the conservative position is.
But, even these Amer-Inds believe in property rights...
Many reservations (most) are not considered deeded property and are actually owned by the Federal Government as Trust lands that they ALLOW the tribe to govern as if they owned it.
Well then.... this actually works in your advantage, especially if you relate upholding property rights in accordance to Nature's Law. It was the Creator's intention that we are become caretakers of the land. How is it possible for a stranger from a distant central government to know more than the individual who is owner of the land? Marxism is not about individual property rights, but about the powerful few using the force of government to deny individual rights of property ownership. Care taking is essential for any property owner and by far the best means of keeping the Laws of Nature.
I agree with you about property rights. You need to spend some time on the rez though - the tribal leaders are always in under the control of whatever corrupt politician will line their pockets, the tribe pretty much agrees to do whatever the tribe's leadership tells them to. They mostly have a strong distrust of anyone not native and give WAY more trust to their tribal leadership than is in their best interests. They are almost to the member on some form of government assistance. Rez living is pretty bleak and the tribe seems okay with their meager existence.
I would tell them about the 1924 Klanbake, then have them listen to this extremely intelligent non-white man tell the truth about politics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3PaqxblOx0&t=2s
"If you want to see an example of failed socialism, go to an Indian reservation."
https://youtu.be/xVANRroxuOo?t=507
Totalitarian government goons are the problem irrespective of what the individual labels themselves. Terrible people will do despicable things for power and identify as whatever is necessary to get that power. The left is obsessed with labels and identity. Some will never get it or don't care. I just want them to leave me alone as they call me a white supremacist conservative.
Amer-Inds are very connected to Nature and to Nature's God. The Laws of Nature are the basis for Adamic Law that proceeds Thomas Aquinas foundational writings on Natural Law and Common Law. If it is taken from perspective and how our Constitution incorporated all of this, inroads to understanding could occur. The Marxist appeal to many Amer-Inds has to do with denying property rights. But, even these Amer-Inds believe in property rights otherwise they wouldn't being claiming their rights to the land. Marxism is property rights as long as the ruling class owns it and it is denied to the people. From this perspective, there can be understanding in what the conservative position is.
Many reservations (most) are not considered deeded property and are actually owned by the Federal Government as Trust lands that they ALLOW the tribe to govern as if they owned it.
This^^
Well then.... this actually works in your advantage, especially if you relate upholding property rights in accordance to Nature's Law. It was the Creator's intention that we are become caretakers of the land. How is it possible for a stranger from a distant central government to know more than the individual who is owner of the land? Marxism is not about individual property rights, but about the powerful few using the force of government to deny individual rights of property ownership. Care taking is essential for any property owner and by far the best means of keeping the Laws of Nature.
I agree with you about property rights. You need to spend some time on the rez though - the tribal leaders are always in under the control of whatever corrupt politician will line their pockets, the tribe pretty much agrees to do whatever the tribe's leadership tells them to. They mostly have a strong distrust of anyone not native and give WAY more trust to their tribal leadership than is in their best interests. They are almost to the member on some form of government assistance. Rez living is pretty bleak and the tribe seems okay with their meager existence.
I hear you. I heard a county attorney say some jaw-dropping stuff about dealing with tribal communities.
Dems were the slave owners.
Dems were the kkk.
Dems fought against the civil rights movement.
This person has collected a bunch of words not rooted in fact.
And those states didn't make voting harder, they made cheating harder. Big difference.
This person sounds like a lost cause.