"Based on my decoding there are many “Sciences” that are outright lies, and so let’s discuss how that’s even possible.
It’s the scientific community that lends credibility to what is true & false and the MSM is the one that spreads it. It is the rich that decide who gets the science dollars. Therefore it has to be asked, what if objectivity is not the goal?
What if those with money specifically want to give credibility to a lie? Do scientists stand up to this? And if they did, how would we even know? Would MSM take it seriously? Would tech allow it to trend? Are they that noble? Or would they more likely fall under the same marching orders as the fake science funding?
The foundation of the scientific world, the money that keeps it alive, is suspect. To untangle it all we have to have comms awareness and then dig into history."
Getting angry at doctors is akin to throwing a hissy fit at the enemies pawns.
"Based on my decoding there are many “Sciences” that are outright lies, and so let’s discuss how that’s even possible.
It’s the scientific community that lends credibility to what is true & false and the MSM is the one that spreads it. It is the rich that decide who gets the science dollars. Therefore it has to be asked, what if objectivity is not the goal?
What if those with money specifically want to give credibility to a lie? Do scientists stand up to this? And if they did, how would we even know? Would MSM take it seriously? Would tech allow it to trend? Are they that noble? Or would they more likely fall under the same marching orders as the fake science funding?
The foundation of the scientific world, the money that keeps it alive, is suspect. To untangle it all we have to have comms awareness and then dig into history."
Getting angry at doctors is akin to throwing a hissy fit at the enemies pawns.