Okay... I see, now... because the date of the watch is a 19, it's an even stronger fit.
So, whereas a single Q post of a picture of a watch with 4:49, date of 19 posted on September 19th 2018 and the words "Castle LOCK" WOULD have been a jaw-dropping A+ Q proof...
And a post of a picture of a watch with the date 19 and time 4:49 but not posted by Q on 9/19 coupled with the "Castle LOCK" from the 9/19/2018 post is a B+ Q Proof (still way above average, but not jaw-dropping, in my opinion).
Okay... I see, now... because the date of the watch is a 19, it's an even stronger fit.
So, whereas a single Q post of a picture of a watch with 4:49, date of 19 posted on September 19th 2018 and the words "Castle LOCK" WOULD have been a jaw-dropping A+ Q proof...
And a post of a picture of a watch with the date 19 and time 4:49 but not posted by Q on 9/19 coupled with the "Castle LOCK" from the 9/19/2018 post is a B+ Q Proof (still way above average, but not jaw-dropping, in my opinion).
Sorry for the assumptions.
😉 NP...Its all good...