I saw several threads about the flag with no stars at the Trump rally. Many people were saying it was a lighting issue. Bullshit! Most of the people saying it was a lighting issue were shills/handshake accounts.
This flag was Trump's final warning to the deep state, surrender now or feel the pain.
4 U.S. Code § 10 - Modification of rules and customs by President
Any rule or custom pertaining to the display of the flag of the United States of America, set forth herein, may be altered, modified, or repealed, or additional rules with respect thereto may be prescribed, by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, whenever he deems it to be appropriate or desirable; and any such alteration or additional rule shall be set forth in a proclamation.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/10
Did you catch that? The flag can be modified by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States!!!!
There Were No Stars on the Flag at Donald Trump’s Rally. What that Means is..
There were no stars on the flag last night as President Trump entered and exited the stage. For those who don’t know what an American flag without the stars means you have to ask someone whose been in the military. The simple answer is surrender. American flag without the stars tells your enemy that further aggression on their part will mean total annihilation, complete destruction or obliteration, If your the enemy and you choose to surrender you be treated well. President Trump was sending deep state a message.
So Trump was sending the deep state a message, surrender now or you will be obliterated.
At the end of Trump's term, on Dec 8th, 2020, Ezra Cohen Watnick explains the DoD change in special ops forces command structure. Ha explains that it was JFK that predicted a rise in Special Ops forces for a new kind of war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmaldemREH8
In the Ghost in the Machine video at the 1:00 minute mark you see the phrase, "You will find us in the shadows", then you see Special Ops team moving in on its target.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA4e0NqyYMw
At the 1:08 mark you see the phrase, "At the tip of the Spear"
You can see the Special Ops Emblem here. A spear tip.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Special_Operations_Command
Special Operations Forces are involved in various types of missions ranging from combat and counterterrorism operations to hostage rescue and humanitarian aid.
https://www.military.com/special-operations
How will it play out? Here is the main theory.
The 10 days of Darnkess will be a shutdown of the internet and certain communication systems. This will prevent the deep state from communicating with each other. During this time President Trump will be using EBS messages to keep people calm and perhaps give some historical details of the deep state crimes.
The Special Op's teams will begin rounding up deep state targets. 10th Mountain division will assist Special Op forces with transporting captives and maintain peace on the streets of our cities. Captives will be moved to GITMO for very quick military tribunals.
Biden wants to shut Gitmo down, but construction for 9/11 trial ramps up.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-wants-shut-gitmo-down-construction-9-11-trial-ramps-up
I wonder who will be drug in to this 9/11 trial. Is this the reason for the sad face on Bush Jr at his daddy's funeral?
Catherine Herridge Reports On The Expansion Of Gitmo Despite Biden’s Attempt To Close The Detention Camps
If Biden was really in charge of the military and all his associates were facing military tribunal, don't you think he would shut GITMO down? Nope, he is not in charge. President Trump is controlling the military. He is still our Commander in Chief.
Buy some books for darnkess.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
I don't mind criticism at all, hammer away. The Snope's fact checker and I have a history. There was a post from a while back that he and I went back and forth on for a week or so. He was trying to deny something that was written in the Law of War manual and there have been several instances since then.
Yes, I saw the stars, I know the stars were there, but they were hidden to anyone who wasn't standing near the flag. If you look at the flag from the audience or from the broadcast video it appears there are no stars and that is the point. The appearance of no stars is what being displayed to the general population. It wasn't a lighting issue; they were intentionally covered with a blue veil or darkened to make them appear to be gone.
The title of the USSA article said, "No Stars" and it has been used as an adjective since then when talking about the subject. So yes, I saw the stars, we know they were there however there was an attempted effort by the Trump team to make the stars appear to be gone and it wasn't by accident, it had meaning.
I have a completely different view. Let me fix this for you: "He was trying to deny or object to my interpretations of what is written in the Law of War manual."
I made no attempt to deny what is written in the Law of War Manual. What I challenged was YOUR interpretation of what it means.
You seem to be unable to distinguish between your own interpretations and the words themselves.
Please make an effort to distinguish between objective facts on one hand and your own theories and interpretations on the other. Between what is written as opposed to what you think what is written means.
Your theories re: the L.O.W. manual are interpretations. They are what you think it means. What you think it means is not necessarily what it means. Unless you are infallible. And neither of us is infallible.
This is not a fact. This is your theory.
Do you ever consider that you might be wrong? Or is that simply impossible?
"we know they were there ... however there was an attempted effort by the Trump team to make the stars appear to be gone and it wasn't by accident, it had meaning"
This is your theory. It's not a fact. A theory can be right or it can be wrong. It can also be partly right and partly wrong.
Theories require proof. But treating a theory as if it is a fact simply because one is convinced of it, that's not rational or reasonable.