For me, the point of my awakening was pre-Q, when an incident known as the so-called "vanishing" of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH-370 occurred. There's just way too much surveillance over our skies for me to believe the BS that was relayed by MSM outlets after that. And after that, it was one rabbit hole after another that led me towards getting the full picture of what was truly up. My only real exposure to "conspiracy theories" prior to this point was the (extremely little) knowledge that the rap community (for e.g. Immortal Technique) were speaking about things such as the Illuminati and 9/11 and Reptilians and all of that stuff, and, like any other normie, I refused to believe it. At that time, I clubbed it all in with "tinfoil hatter nonsense", like how the normies now club anything that sounds unbelievable with "flat earther nonsense" and such. But yes, after that flight disappearance incident, I pretty much woke up full-scale in about less than 6 months or so.
What's your awakening story?
Dr. Judy Wood. Directed Energy Weapons. This one makes people angry and resort to name calling. Or it's just way beyond what 'most' of the herd can manage.
I've not read this book/research. Is it at all possible to TL;DR that one?
Speaking of which, the horror that is MKULTRA is yet another one of the monstrosities that rattled me the most. Also the Guantanamo Bay prisoner abuse situation, although I haven't researched the actual tortures they did here in depth or anything.
Primary claim is that it couldn't have "only" been well known techniques used to create the controlled demolition because there just isn't enough rubble. I think she makes a bit of a leap that it must be a directed energy weapon but she is pretty convincing that there was definitely something top secret used in the destruction of the buildings that day.
Bit of a huge leap if you ask me.
A lot of the rubble was dust spread all over NYC, it's not like it disappeared. Also, a lot of the metal ended up in the basement, and some of it was ejected into the surrounding buildings. Sure if you just hone in on the area around the towers above ground, it doesn't look like it's enough, but that's hardly the whole picture.
Encourage frens to take a closer look at Dr. Judy Wood's work.
the main question she raises I took seriously is that they used something that turned far more of the building to dust than a typical controlled demolition. From my own research, I think it's just a military grade nanothermite that hasn't been widely used for building demo
The seismic data doesn't reflect the tonnage of these buildings collapsing, as if these buildings were 'lifted off the ground'. The seismic data indicates that they 'went away' in 9 seconds for one building and 11 for the other which is not possible according to the official story. Some have suggested thermite, but the amount of heat and quantity of this incendiary would have severely burned the people covered with the dust and they wouldn't have been able to breathe. There was a significant lack of heat. Firefighters reporting that the steel in their boots was 'melting' with their feet IN them. There were trees with green leaves still on them right next to the former buildings. People reported strange levitation events. Weird fires that don't burn paper. Images from above the debris field have circular holes. The debris field is at ground level. Some suggest it 'collapsed' into the basement but there are images and video of perfectly intact areas of the basement(s). Testimony of a person inside the building when it was 'collapsing' and then looking up at the clear blue sky above. Where did it go? All this steel, concrete and building materials burned up but paper didn't. Steel beams bent in a manner not consistent with what steel deformation should look like. Nothing hit WTC7 and it just slumped to the ground. Some suggest the OKC 'bombing' has many of the same features of DEW (Directed Energy Weapons). The buildings supposedly collapsed to the ground which would likely have fractured the 'bathtub' concrete foundation/basement, that also holds the water at ground level back, but engineers were concerned that excavators would damage the 'bathtub'. A collapse like this should have flooded lower Manhattan. The Bankers Trust building was repaired, but a year later torn down because of weird rust that couldn't be stopped. ('Non-self quenching molecular disassociation'.) There was Hurricane Erin right off the coast which was basically not reported by the media and stationary that day (field effect) and would have banned planes from the area (why no military jets sent on that day?). Even Geraldo Rivera, 'THE HURRICANE GUY' said, 'Wouldn't it have been nice if there was a hurricane that day.' He didn't even know. There was a massive change in the earth's magnet field right at the time the buildings went away. All the data is in the public domain and irrefutable but many cannot cross the threshold of cognitive dissonance. There's much more.
This is a tough one. As Neil Kramer said in a Veritas Radio (Mel Hostalrich/Fabregs) interview (Episode 146), "...anyone, in my view, who denies her research with out taking a close look at it is either stupid or they're on the payroll and that's a bold thing to say and I wouldn't usually bother to say something like that but I feel quite strongly about that and I've seen her interviewed countless times, I've gone over her research at some length, to say the least. I've seen numerous attempts to debunk this woman and they've failed and they've failed because she is not dealing with anything other than what is there right in front of our eyes and she's pretty on top of that ethos."
They lie about everything in spectacularly massive ways. “Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.”― Plato
Hell yes. There were cars on the street that were literally melted while nothing around them was even touched.