It used to all be done locally and for far less money. The Fed used to be very small and was mostly for defense of the country, or disputes between states. People in the community would decide if they wanted to pay for something to be built. My family in Mass. built a one room school house/church for the community.
Still no fella or fellette, can't let your illogical angst go by unmolested.
First you say taxes are ok then same post no you don't like them. local taxes ARE taxes you see, regardless of your juvenile need to be vulgar and unwillingness to digest simple logic. Same sorta thing the Enemy does- refuse logic and science and reality while embracing fee-fees, operating off of emotions rather than Reason.
Vulgar ignorance instead of understanding, willful ignorance at that.
Jeez, you've put a lot of thought into this we can tell. You made it all the way to the very first objection literally everyone has. But muh roads?!? As if we can make a flat surface without rulers.
Taxation is technically a form of extortion. Pay us or else. And extortion is a type of theft. Define Theft. Define Extortion. It's not rocket science.
I merely offered 'you' simple Reasons and examples, even so you cannot manage to refute the need for government to assess taxes. Attempt weak-azz juvenile insults all you wish but unless you have logical rebuttal you too may line up to kiss my azz.
Theft is taking anything not belonging to you. Extortion is trading, usually at a falsely arranged price. Extortion is only possible when the 'victim' is hiding his or her own criminal or tawdry activity too, just saying.
Taxation is not extortion at all, corrupt people can and do defraud taxes but that reality does not affect the rationale of taxes. The fact People corrupt taxes speaks to the falseness of People, not taxes.
How would you pay for the Wall? How would you pay for defense, for schools, for courts? Rhetorical questions meant only as an academic exercise for you...
Do research. You’ll find that a good 75%+ of your tax dollar goes to everything but your “roads and police” - more like weapons/defense contractors, big pharma (medical industry), public and privately funded schools (they should be self sustaining but they aren’t), private industry manufacturering, food production, farming/agricultural subsidies, foreign country aid including most recently the Ukraine.
Sadly, you’ve been brainwashed into thinking that all of your tax dollars go to good use. When in all actuality it’s almost entirely wasted on hand-outs that don’t need to exist, if you need a subsidy to stay in business, you shouldn’t be in business.
Spend a day driving around Los Angeles and you’ll quickly realize all those allocated tax dollars that “should” be going to nice smooth roads are going everywhere but infrastructure.
DAMN the stupid is strong with you; how in the fook do you imagine you have any clue as to what I consider about how my taxes are used?
'Sadly, you’ve been brainwashed into thinking that all of your tax dollars go to good use'
DAMN you presume a lot based on nothing, typical leftist/redditard thinking.
You move goalposts instead of communicating on topic, try to focus. The topic isn't what percentage of taxes is used properly but simply the concept of taxes. But using your fee-fees instead of logic you move the target, irrationally move the target. Damn the stupid in here, leftist horsefeathers everywheres.
I began 'doing research' in 1969, and yeah I was paying taxes then too because I had a job from the age of 13. You consider yourself a seer, how is it you didn't seem to 'see' that?
Don’t listen to Covfefe he clearly has brain damage. On one hand he’s calling us “Reddit users” and lashing out at us for not wanting higher taxes. It’s obvious he’s a shill showing his true colors.
To exist a state would need basic “goods and services” taxes but you wouldn’t need to be taxed on your income or property. Anyone who says otherwise can fuck off.
You'd need to define your 'state' for me first, then we could argue it.
On paper and academically speaking a state could exist with no taxes after all. That's impossible of course in reality because people do stupid stuff and cost Society real money, problems, damages and like that.
Yeahno.
Taxation is not theft, it is a necessary Tool of responsible government.
The State is not a mafia.
Property rights are not 'everything', good griefeses.
What a shitty take.
The sign? Yeah ain't it tho.
HAHAHA!!! My bad.....
Ok, enlighten me then. Taxes are theft you think? Who then pays for your roads and schools, your cops and water treatment?
Toss weak-azz attempt at juvenile insults as you wish but unless you got some REAL rebuttal to go with it you're trolling your own bassackwards self.
It used to all be done locally and for far less money. The Fed used to be very small and was mostly for defense of the country, or disputes between states. People in the community would decide if they wanted to pay for something to be built. My family in Mass. built a one room school house/church for the community.
@ u/CovfefeNegro - Gotta admit, yours sounds much gayer.
Still no fella or fellette, can't let your illogical angst go by unmolested.
First you say taxes are ok then same post no you don't like them. local taxes ARE taxes you see, regardless of your juvenile need to be vulgar and unwillingness to digest simple logic. Same sorta thing the Enemy does- refuse logic and science and reality while embracing fee-fees, operating off of emotions rather than Reason.
Vulgar ignorance instead of understanding, willful ignorance at that.
https://files.catbox.moe/mt80lr.png
Jeez, you've put a lot of thought into this we can tell. You made it all the way to the very first objection literally everyone has. But muh roads?!? As if we can make a flat surface without rulers.
Taxation is technically a form of extortion. Pay us or else. And extortion is a type of theft. Define Theft. Define Extortion. It's not rocket science.
We? Got that gerbil in your pocket do you?
I merely offered 'you' simple Reasons and examples, even so you cannot manage to refute the need for government to assess taxes. Attempt weak-azz juvenile insults all you wish but unless you have logical rebuttal you too may line up to kiss my azz.
Theft is taking anything not belonging to you. Extortion is trading, usually at a falsely arranged price. Extortion is only possible when the 'victim' is hiding his or her own criminal or tawdry activity too, just saying.
Taxation is not extortion at all, corrupt people can and do defraud taxes but that reality does not affect the rationale of taxes. The fact People corrupt taxes speaks to the falseness of People, not taxes.
How would you pay for the Wall? How would you pay for defense, for schools, for courts? Rhetorical questions meant only as an academic exercise for you...
https://files.catbox.moe/nkqp06.png
Do research. You’ll find that a good 75%+ of your tax dollar goes to everything but your “roads and police” - more like weapons/defense contractors, big pharma (medical industry), public and privately funded schools (they should be self sustaining but they aren’t), private industry manufacturering, food production, farming/agricultural subsidies, foreign country aid including most recently the Ukraine.
Sadly, you’ve been brainwashed into thinking that all of your tax dollars go to good use. When in all actuality it’s almost entirely wasted on hand-outs that don’t need to exist, if you need a subsidy to stay in business, you shouldn’t be in business.
Spend a day driving around Los Angeles and you’ll quickly realize all those allocated tax dollars that “should” be going to nice smooth roads are going everywhere but infrastructure.
DAMN the stupid is strong with you; how in the fook do you imagine you have any clue as to what I consider about how my taxes are used?
'Sadly, you’ve been brainwashed into thinking that all of your tax dollars go to good use'
DAMN you presume a lot based on nothing, typical leftist/redditard thinking.
You move goalposts instead of communicating on topic, try to focus. The topic isn't what percentage of taxes is used properly but simply the concept of taxes. But using your fee-fees instead of logic you move the target, irrationally move the target. Damn the stupid in here, leftist horsefeathers everywheres.
I began 'doing research' in 1969, and yeah I was paying taxes then too because I had a job from the age of 13. You consider yourself a seer, how is it you didn't seem to 'see' that?
Learn to THINK for yourself.
https://files.catbox.moe/mt80lr.png
So, it is your contention that a state cannot exist without taxation?
Don’t listen to Covfefe he clearly has brain damage. On one hand he’s calling us “Reddit users” and lashing out at us for not wanting higher taxes. It’s obvious he’s a shill showing his true colors.
To exist a state would need basic “goods and services” taxes but you wouldn’t need to be taxed on your income or property. Anyone who says otherwise can fuck off.
So, no.
Damn.
Ok, how about eliminating income and property taxes? Could a state be viable with only a consumption tax? Like the Fair Tax plan?
You'd need to define your 'state' for me first, then we could argue it.
On paper and academically speaking a state could exist with no taxes after all. That's impossible of course in reality because people do stupid stuff and cost Society real money, problems, damages and like that.