thanks, spoiled and ungrateful fools. I'm looking forward to the Q team and Q+ long term solution.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Could be a combination of reasons
One reason is they are herd animals, they calculate it is safer to be wrong with the mainstream than right with the outliers. For example, my wife claims I am wrong about things I am not in the majority. So either she can never believe a minority position or she can't risk investigating it. There is a heavy social price to pay for being in the minority on such as important subject as the vax for example. You lose your friends and family if you insist on talking about it. If you are into evolutionary psychology, then the strategy of choosing to be wrong with the herd over right and on your own and exposed makes sense. That is, until the cabal convinces everyone to inject poison.
Another reason is to do with your own self image and changing your mind. Scott Adams is a great example. He knows he's clever, he knows he understands psychology, so it's a really enormous whack to his ego to find that he was played over the vax. He just can't take it.
“they calculate it is safer to be wrong with the mainstream than right with the outliers.”
yup
Yes, Scot Adams is a good example of pride and ego preventing people from admitting that they were tricked into injecting themselves with an experimental gene therapy that is damaging their own health.
Speaking of Scott Adams, his argument was that "nobody knew" and purebloods just somehow guessed correctly, while he guessed wrong. He is full of shit... flailing around trying to come up with an excuse.
The logic at the time that Scott totally missed was based on:
a) the cold and flu did not magically disappear during those years
b) covid is no more deadly than the flu
c) the mRNA gene therapy is not a vaccine
d) the mRNA gene therapy is experimental, and released under EUA
e) the mRNA gene therapies have never successfully passed a clinical trial
Add all of that up, and the logical conclusion was/is that the virus itself is much less of a risk than the experimental injections, especially when you factor in multiple safe, effective and inexpensive treatments (HCQ, IVM).
Only later did we learn that the injections were actually harmful. But by that time, I had already rejected the idea of getting any of the injections for the reasons listed above.
Great summary!
Yes, me too.
Also I had seen the Deagel population projections for the west and so I already knew the cabal wanted to depopulate. I thought they would use kinetic war, but when the 'rona then the vax came along, I switched my hypothesis to the cabal using biological weapons on us. So I knew not to take the vax they pressed on us.
The problem Scott Adams has with us is that we were right too early therefore wrong. He has to be first because he is smartest.