Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
You can only disprove an affirmation, not a negative. What do you think you would be proving? Theories cannot be proven, only used or rejected for being useless. But it is a step forward that you are swearing off theories.
Operation Trust involved a large population of known figures who had been turned in their loyalty in order to lure others. I don't see that pattern in the Q movement. Who is Q? Nobody knows. Has anyone been lured on the strength of personal trust? I doubt it. Do we trust Donald Trump? I think so, and for good reasons.
Also, Operation Trust resulted in a hall of mirrors, where the Soviet government lost track of the ball. Just as seems to be happening with you.
You have to ignore all the reasons not to trust Donald Trump though. The possible tactic being deployed here is that the MSM go way overboard in their criticism of him knowing that there are those who will have an automatic, Pavlovian response to what they say and take up the opposite position with extra zeal.
In this manner, they can shepherd you into holding mindsets and beliefs you might otherwise not adopt.
Also, I reject your general demeanour of positioning yourself as someone more knowledgable than others on this topic when you just aren’t. You have no idea either but you are closed off to certain possibilities and appear to have a certain condescension in your writing.
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are related don’t forget. All president of the United States come from European royal bloodlines. Donald Trump is supposed to be an outsider president, one who broke the stranglehold, but we know that he is related to John of Gaunt, just like his 19th cousin Hillary.
From the perspective of US Presidents and other leaders around the world all being members of the same family, Trump was very much business as usual. You need to contend with that.
There is also Donald Trump immediate response to the fall of the twin towers being to boast about him now having the tallest building in New York. Quite a tasteless remark no matter how much you love him. As in to that that his personal lawyer was Rude Giuliano whom a lot of people reasonably expect was something to do with it and it really gets a bit murky.
Also, Donald Trump famously sought to preserve only the Albert Pike statue from the destruction of BLM. This was Pikes statue in DC commemorating his exalted position in Freemasonry, rather than his confederate generalship and what did Pike predict about 3 works wars? (Actually, saying it was ‘predicted’ makes it sound like a guess rather than a plan). Two of those wars have come to pass and we appear to be approaching the brink of a 3rd. And what else did Pike say about Freemasonry controlling both sides? Something like ‘whether hero or villain, we have them both’ referring to the fallacious nature of world events.
It doesn’t matter whether the Soviets lost control of Operation Trust or not because these people are capable of learning from their mistakes of history and correcting for next time whereas it would appear the layman is not. The layman seems barely to have any concept of history. And not just the layman, but a lot of the so called awakened too.
I've been following presidential politics since 1960. I've paid my dues.
We are all descended from Adam, too. Remote descent means nothing. Matters of taste are...matters of taste, also meaning nothing. Albert Pike? Famously sought? Haven't heard of it until now. Trump was concerned over the statue being the only one to commemorate a Confederate general---regardless of whether he had been a Freemason. Pike was something of a colorful figure, and Trump admires them when they have a life of accomplishment. Pike's Freemasonry also means nothing.
If it doesn't matter whether the Soviets lost control of Operation Trust, then it doesn't matter whether it was successful---because you cannot have success without control. That's a signal lesson not to go down that road. When they are acting so stupidly (as averred by Q and evident in the Ukraine situation), why should you think they would be mentally dexterous enough to "learn and correct"? You are trying to bend together mutually contradictory premises into a pretzel.
At some point, you have to decide whether the Sun is real or it is only a light bulb in the sky. When it does only the things that a Sun can do, there is only one rational conclusion.
That was a load of psuedo-intellectual, excuse making drivel
If so, present particulars. If you can't, you wear the label.